Ekphrasis The Illusion of the Natural Sign

Originally published in 1992. What, in apparently pictorial poetry, do words represent? Conversely, how can words in a poem be picturable? Murray Krieger develops a systematic theoretical statement out of answers to such questions. Ekphrasis is his account of the continuing debates over meaning in l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krieger, Murray (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Johns Hopkins University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_88840
005 20220715
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220715s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a book.68495 
020 |a 9781421430201 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1353/book.68495  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a DSA  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Krieger, Murray  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Ekphrasis  |b The Illusion of the Natural Sign 
260 |b Johns Hopkins University Press  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (322 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Originally published in 1992. What, in apparently pictorial poetry, do words represent? Conversely, how can words in a poem be picturable? Murray Krieger develops a systematic theoretical statement out of answers to such questions. Ekphrasis is his account of the continuing debates over meaning in language from Plato to the present. Krieger sees the modernist position as the logical outcome of these debates but argues that more recent theories radically question the political and aesthetic assumptions of the modernists and the two-thousand-year tradition they claim to culminate. Krieger focuses on ekphrasis-the literary representation of visual art, real or imaginary-a form at least as old as its most famous example, the shield of Achilles verbally invented in the Iliad. He argues that the "ekphrastic principle" has remained enduringly problematic in that it reflects the resistant paradoxes of representation in words. As he examines the conflict between the spatial and temporal, between vision-centered and word-centered metaphors, Krieger reveals how literary theory has been shaped by the attempts and the deceptive failures of language to do the job of the "natural sign." 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Literary theory  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Literary theory 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/68495  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88840  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication