Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception Historical and Critical Studies
Originally published in 1964. In four essays, Professor Mandelbaum challenges some of the most common assumptions of contemporary epistemology. Through historical analyses and critical argument, he attempts to show that one cannot successfully sever the connections between philosophic and scientific...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Johns Hopkins University Press
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_88864 | ||
005 | 20220715 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20220715s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a book.70848 | ||
020 | |a 9781421431710 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/book.70848 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a PDA |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Mandelbaum, Maurice |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Philosophy, Science, and Sense Perception |b Historical and Critical Studies |
260 | |b Johns Hopkins University Press |c 2019 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (278 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Originally published in 1964. In four essays, Professor Mandelbaum challenges some of the most common assumptions of contemporary epistemology. Through historical analyses and critical argument, he attempts to show that one cannot successfully sever the connections between philosophic and scientific accounts of sense perception. While each essay is independent of the others, and the argument of each must therefore be judged on its own merits, one theme is common to all: that critical realism, as Mandelbaum calls it, is a viable epistemological position, even though some schools of thought hold it in low esteem. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Philosophy of science |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Philosophy of science | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/70848 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88864 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |