Brecht's Tradition

Originally published in 1967. Literary scholars often acknowledge that Brecht borrowed from a variety of traditions, including Goethe, Schiller, expressionists, naturalists, and realists, all of whom affected his work. However, they tend not to address any single tradition as exclusively Brecht'...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Spalter, Max (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Johns Hopkins University Press 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_88959
005 20220715
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220715s2019 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a book.71586 
020 |a 9781421435503 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1353/book.71586  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a DSG  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Spalter, Max  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Brecht's Tradition 
260 |b Johns Hopkins University Press  |c 2019 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (286 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Originally published in 1967. Literary scholars often acknowledge that Brecht borrowed from a variety of traditions, including Goethe, Schiller, expressionists, naturalists, and realists, all of whom affected his work. However, they tend not to address any single tradition as exclusively Brecht's. From these various literary traditions, Brecht borrowed formal elements only; compared with other writers to whom he is indebted, Brecht exceeds them in cynicism. They do not convey anything like his pitiless debunking attitude, his corrosive anti-romanticism, his hardheaded refusal to idealize or glorify, and his suspicion of all sentimentalities. This book discusses what the author identifies as the "Brechtian sensibility." Chroniclers of drama have not totally ignored the Brechtian tradition, but too often they are content to note merely that Brecht shared with some writers-particularly Büchner and Wedekind-a proclivity for open drama and episodes of racy realism tinged with poetic feeling. Other critics have not closely studied the various plays of this tradition in order to show how they constitute a distinctive and well-defined species of theater to which Brecht unmistakably belongs. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Literary studies: plays & playwrights  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Literary studies: plays & playwrights 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/71586  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/88959  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication