Atomic Assurance The Alliance Politics of Nuclear Proliferation

Do alliances curb efforts by states to develop nuclear weapons? Atomic Assurance looks at what makes alliances sufficiently credible to prevent nuclear proliferation; how alliances can break down and so encourage nuclear proliferation; and whether security guarantors like the United States can use a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lanoszka, Alexander (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Cornell University Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_91662
005 20220905
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20220905s2018 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a book.73414 
020 |a 9781501729195 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.1353/book.73414  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JW  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Lanoszka, Alexander  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Atomic Assurance  |b The Alliance Politics of Nuclear Proliferation 
260 |b Cornell University Press  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (216 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Do alliances curb efforts by states to develop nuclear weapons? Atomic Assurance looks at what makes alliances sufficiently credible to prevent nuclear proliferation; how alliances can break down and so encourage nuclear proliferation; and whether security guarantors like the United States can use alliance ties to end the nuclear efforts of their allies.Alexander Lanoszka finds that military alliances are less useful in preventing allies from acquiring nuclear weapons than conventional wisdom suggests. Through intensive case studies of West Germany, Japan, and South Korea, as well as a series of smaller cases on Great Britain, France, Norway, Australia, and Taiwan, Atomic Assurance shows that it is easier to prevent an ally from initiating a nuclear program than to stop an ally that has already started one; in-theater conventional forces are crucial in making American nuclear guarantees credible; the American coercion of allies who started, or were tempted to start, a nuclear weapons program has played less of a role in forestalling nuclear proliferation than analysts have assumed; and the economic or technological reliance of a security-dependent ally on the United States works better to reverse or to halt that ally's nuclear bid than anything else.Crossing diplomatic history, international relations, foreign policy, grand strategy, and nuclear strategy, Lanoszka's book reworks our understanding of the power and importance of alliances in stopping nuclear proliferation. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Warfare & defence  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Warfare & defence 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/73414  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/91662  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication