Diálogos Sur-Sur Reflexiones sobre el sur, las desigualdades epistémicas y la democratización global de los saberes
One of the keys to understanding global inequalities and seeking ways to overcome them is to accept and develop a theoretical assumption: the euphemistically called global "asymmetries" are not only economic or geopolitical. They are equally symbolic. This is where the debates on epistemic...
Saved in:
Other Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Santiago, Chile
Ariadna Ediciones
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_94695 | ||
005 | 20221209 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20221209s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|spa d | ||
020 | |a ae9789566095712.56 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.26448/ae9789566095712.56 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a spa | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a JFC |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Devés, Eduardo |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Pereira da Silva, Fabricio |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Ngoie Tshibambe, Germain |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Baltar, Paula |4 edt | |
700 | 1 | |a Devés, Eduardo |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pereira da Silva, Fabricio |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ngoie Tshibambe, Germain |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Baltar, Paula |4 oth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diálogos Sur-Sur |b Reflexiones sobre el sur, las desigualdades epistémicas y la democratización global de los saberes |
260 | |a Santiago, Chile |b Ariadna Ediciones |c 2022 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (265 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a One of the keys to understanding global inequalities and seeking ways to overcome them is to accept and develop a theoretical assumption: the euphemistically called global "asymmetries" are not only economic or geopolitical. They are equally symbolic. This is where the debates on epistemic dependency (Beigel, 2013) and the coloniality of knowledge (2000) are located, the reflections on "epistemic violence" and "epistemicides" (Spivak, 1988, Santos, Meneses, 2009), on the subject colonial and postcolonial (Césaire, 2004, Fanon, 1966, Hall, 2015) and, in particular, on the role of the "peripheral intellectual" and the production of knowledge in the "Sures" (Devés, 2017). In fact, it is perceived that peripheral knowledge and knowledge have less legitimacy than central knowledge and are frequently not considered "science" or "theory". Their proposals do not circulate or circulate little and tend to disappear over time. | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a Spanish | ||
650 | 7 | |a Cultural studies |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a South-South Studies; epistemic differences; periphery, Studies of ideas | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/59881/1/978-956-6095-71-2.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/94695 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |