Concepts and the Appeal to Cognitive Science
This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are pro...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Berlin/Boston
De Gruyter
2021
|
| Series: | Dissertations in Language and Cognition
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doab_20_500_12854_97384 | ||
| 005 | 20230217 | ||
| 003 | oapen | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
| 008 | 20230217s2021 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110708165 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110708165 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110708226 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783110708035 | ||
| 040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9783110708165 |c doi | |
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a CF |2 bicssc | |
| 072 | 7 | |a CFA |2 bicssc | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Taylor, Samuel D. |4 auth | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Concepts and the Appeal to Cognitive Science |
| 260 | |a Berlin/Boston |b De Gruyter |c 2021 | ||
| 300 | |a 1 electronic resource (193 p.) | ||
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Dissertations in Language and Cognition | |
| 506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
| 520 | |a This book evaluates whether or not we can decide on the best theory of concepts by appealing to the explanatory results of cognitive science. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of different theories of concepts and of the explanations formulated in cognitive science. As a result, two reasons are provided for thinking that an appeal to cognitive science cannot help to decide on the best theory of concepts. | ||
| 540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a linguistics |2 bicssc | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Philosophy of language |2 bicssc | |
| 653 | |a Concepts | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Science | ||
| 653 | |a Cognitive Scientific Explanations | ||
| 653 | |a Mental Representations | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110708165 |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/97384 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |