Chapter 45 Journalism ethics and its participatory turn

Journalism ethics have long relied on a conceptual distinction between professional communicators and their audience in the process of ascribing responsibility. In a time of participation and produsage, however, this distinction has become obsolete. This chapter presents results from three waves of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eberwein, Tobias (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_97684
005 20230303
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230303s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9780429262708-51 
020 |a 9780367206475 
020 |a 9781032041599 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9780429262708-51  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a JFD  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Eberwein, Tobias  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 45 Journalism ethics and its participatory turn 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (9 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Journalism ethics have long relied on a conceptual distinction between professional communicators and their audience in the process of ascribing responsibility. In a time of participation and produsage, however, this distinction has become obsolete. This chapter presents results from three waves of problem-centered interviews with online journalists, media users, and experts from the field of media self-regulation in order to identify and structure the ethical problems of user participation in journalism. The results of the empirical study provide evidence of a participatory turn in journalism ethics, which is, however, by no means complete. Although participants describe similar challenges they encounter in the process of participatory content production, they refer to different sets of norms and values to justify quality judgments about their media products. The analysis shows that the principles of reciprocity and mutuality, as discussed in communitarian ethics and the ethics of care, could serve as new leitmotifs in the future process of shaping a timely ethic of produsage. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Media studies  |2 bicssc 
653 |a broadcasting regulation, China, ethical ideology, Ethics, hate speech, Islamic perspective, journalistic practice, Leveson, Media ethics, media representation, moral dilemmas, newsrooms, objectivity, press freedom, privacy,Religious ultra-Orthodoxy, Slow journalism, social media, social responsibility, Ubuntu, whistleblowers 
773 1 0 |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: The Routledge Companion to Journalism Ethics 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/61400/1/9780429262708_10.4324_9780429262708-51.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/97684  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication