How Government Experts Self-Sabotage The Language of the Rebuffed

After official policy advice to governments is publicly released, governments are often accused of ignoring or rejecting their experts. Commonly represented as politicisation, this depiction is superficial. Digging deeper, is there something about the official advice itself that makes it easy to ign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerblinger, Christiane (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Canberra ANU Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_97796
005 20230303
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230303s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a HGESS.2022 
020 |a 9781760465421 
020 |a 9781760465414 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.22459/HGESS.2022  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a GTC  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JPP  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a JPQB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a Gerblinger, Christiane  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a How Government Experts Self-Sabotage  |b The Language of the Rebuffed 
260 |a Canberra  |b ANU Press  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (310 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a After official policy advice to governments is publicly released, governments are often accused of ignoring or rejecting their experts. Commonly represented as politicisation, this depiction is superficial. Digging deeper, is there something about the official advice itself that makes it easy to ignore? Instead of lamenting a demise of expertise, Christiane Gerblinger asks: does the expert advice of policy officials feature characteristics that invite its government audience to overlook or misread it? To answer this question, Gerblinger critically examines official policy advice and finds the language of the rebuffed: government experts reluctant to disclose what they know so as to accommodate political circumstances. She argues that this language evades stable meaning and diminishes the democratic right of citizens to scrutinise the work of government. 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Communication studies  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Public administration  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Central government policies  |2 bicssc 
653 |a policy 
653 |a evidence 
653 |a expertise 
653 |a Communication 
653 |a knowledge construction 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/61566/1/9781760465421.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/97796  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication