Chapter 7 The Power to Perform Experiments

Do humans have abilities to perform scientific experiments? Do humans possess real powers for performing scientific experiments? I shall treat these two questions in turn where the first will bring us to the second. I shall argue that the scientific image of humans must cohere with the manifest imag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: De Haan, Daniel D. (auth)
Format: Electronic Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:DOAB: download the publication
DOAB: description of the publication
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500
001 doab_20_500_12854_98206
005 20230309
003 oapen
006 m o d
007 cr|mn|---annan
008 20230309s2022 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d
020 |a 9781003125860-10 
020 |a 9780367637149 
020 |a 9780367646981 
040 |a oapen  |c oapen 
024 7 |a 10.4324/9781003125860-10  |c doi 
041 0 |a eng 
042 |a dc 
072 7 |a HPJ  |2 bicssc 
072 7 |a HRAB  |2 bicssc 
100 1 |a De Haan, Daniel D.  |4 auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 7 The Power to Perform Experiments 
260 |b Taylor & Francis  |c 2022 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (29 p.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a Do humans have abilities to perform scientific experiments? Do humans possess real powers for performing scientific experiments? I shall treat these two questions in turn where the first will bring us to the second. I shall argue that the scientific image of humans must cohere with the manifest image of humans as having the ability to exercise rational embodied control, which constitutes the power to perform scientific experiments. I first argue why rational embodied control is indispensable to the ability to perform a scientific experiment. I then argue that an ontology of causal powers provides the best explanation for this ability to make the causal difference in reality required for scientists to effectively perform scientific experiments and arrive at scientific truths. I then conclude by considering a major objection against the alternative standard causal theory of action, which would also undermine the thesis that scientists perform experiments. I show why neo-Aristotelian causal power realism does not face this objection in its explanation of how scientists exercise real rational embodied causal control within their experiments. 
536 |a Templeton World Charity Foundation 
540 |a Creative Commons  |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  |2 cc  |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Philosophy of religion  |2 bicssc 
653 |a William M.R. Simpson, Robert Koons, James Orr, Nicholas Teh, Hasok Chang, Stephen Boulter, David Oderberg, Janice Chik, Daniel De Haan, Antonio Ramos-Diaz, Christopher Hauser, Travis Dumsday, Ross Inman, Anne Peterson, Edward Feser, Alexander Pruss, Neo-Aristotelian metaphysics, theology of nature, science and theology, Aristotelianism, naturalism, pluralism, substantial powers, materialism, thermochemical powers, proportionality, evolution, essentialism, animal powers, causal powers, experiments, mathematical powers, hylomorphism, philosophy of nature, grounding 
773 1 0 |t Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature  |7 nnaa  |o OAPEN Library UUID: ae8305bf-a66d-47e6-8330-bb21b78587f9 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/61654/1/9781003125860_10.4324_9781003125860-10.pdf  |7 0  |z DOAB: download the publication 
856 4 0 |a www.oapen.org  |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/98206  |7 0  |z DOAB: description of the publication