Seductive Reasoning Pluralism as the Problematic of Contemporary Literary Theory
Seductive Reasoning takes a provocative look at contemporary Anglo-American literary theory, calling into question the critical consensus on pluralism's nature and its status in literary studies. Drawing on the insights of Marxist and feminist critical theory and on the works of Althusser, Derr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Book Chapter |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ithaca
Cornell University Press
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | DOAB: download the publication DOAB: description of the publication |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000naaaa2200000uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doab_20_500_12854_99284 | ||
005 | 20230418 | ||
003 | oapen | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr|mn|---annan | ||
008 | 20230418s2016 xx |||||o ||| 0|eng d | ||
020 | |a cfj7-9f90 | ||
020 | |a 9781501707001 | ||
020 | |a 9780801421921 | ||
020 | |a 9781501706998 | ||
020 | |a 9781501707216 | ||
040 | |a oapen |c oapen | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.7298/cfj7-9f90 |c doi | |
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
042 | |a dc | ||
072 | 7 | |a DSA |2 bicssc | |
100 | 1 | |a Rooney, Ellen |4 auth | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Seductive Reasoning |b Pluralism as the Problematic of Contemporary Literary Theory |
260 | |a Ithaca |b Cornell University Press |c 2016 | ||
300 | |a 1 electronic resource (256 p.) | ||
336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
506 | 0 | |a Open Access |2 star |f Unrestricted online access | |
520 | |a Seductive Reasoning takes a provocative look at contemporary Anglo-American literary theory, calling into question the critical consensus on pluralism's nature and its status in literary studies. Drawing on the insights of Marxist and feminist critical theory and on the works of Althusser, Derrida, and Foucault, Rooney reads the pluralist's invitation to join in a "dialogue" as a seductive gesture. Critics who respond find that they must seek to persuade all of their potential readers. Rooney examines pluralism as a form of logic in the work of E. D. Hirsch, as a form of ethics for Wayne Booth, as a rhetoric of persuasion in the books of Stanley Fish. For Paul de Man, Rooney argues, pluralism was a rhetoric of tropes just as it was, for Fredric Jameson, a form of politics. | ||
536 | |a National Endowment for the Humanities | ||
540 | |a Creative Commons |f https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |2 cc |4 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | ||
546 | |a English | ||
650 | 7 | |a Literary theory |2 bicssc | |
653 | |a Literary theory | ||
653 | |a Modern philosophy: since c 1800 | ||
653 | |a Literature: history and criticism | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/62143/1/9781501707001.pdf |7 0 |z DOAB: download the publication |
856 | 4 | 0 | |a www.oapen.org |u https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/99284 |7 0 |z DOAB: description of the publication |