Artificial intelligence model to predict pregnancy and multiple pregnancy risk following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET)

Objective: To decrease multiple pregnancy risk and sustain optimal pregnancy chance by choosing suitable number of embryos during transfer, this study aims to construct artificial intelligence models to predict the pregnancy outcome and multiple pregnancy risk after IVF-ET. Materials and methods: Fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jen-Yu Wen (Author), Chung-Fen Liu (Author), Ming-Ting Chung (Author), Yung-Chieh Tsai (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0062b7a8eab3473ba32ed680a90c84d3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jen-Yu Wen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chung-Fen Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ming-Ting Chung  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yung-Chieh Tsai  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Artificial intelligence model to predict pregnancy and multiple pregnancy risk following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1028-4559 
500 |a 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.11.038 
520 |a Objective: To decrease multiple pregnancy risk and sustain optimal pregnancy chance by choosing suitable number of embryos during transfer, this study aims to construct artificial intelligence models to predict the pregnancy outcome and multiple pregnancy risk after IVF-ET. Materials and methods: From Jan 2010 to Dec 2019, 1507 fresh embryo transfer cycles contained 20 features were obtained. After eliminating incomplete records, 949 treatment cycles were included in the pregnancy model dataset and 380 cycles in the twin pregnancy model dataset. Six machine learning algorithms were used for model building based on the dataset which 70% of the dataset were randomly selected for training and 30% for validation. Model performances were quantified with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. Results: Models built with XGBoost performed best. The pregnancy prediction model produced accuracy of 0.716, sensitivity of 0.711, specificity of 0.719, and AUC of 0.787. The multiple pregnancy prediction model produced accuracy of 0.711, sensitivity of 0.649, specificity of 0.740, and AUC of 0.732. Conclusions: The AI models provide reliable outcome prediction and could be a promising method to decrease multiple pregnancy risk after IVF-ET. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a AI (Artificial intelligence) 
690 |a In vitro fertilization (IVF) 
690 |a Machine learning 
690 |a Pregnancy 
690 |a Multiple pregnancy 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol 61, Iss 5, Pp 837-846 (2022) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455922002169 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1028-4559 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0062b7a8eab3473ba32ed680a90c84d3  |z Connect to this object online.