Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Generations of Resin Bonding Agents and Glass Ionomer to Dentin

Background and Aim: Due to specific properties of dentin, such as tubular structure and intrinsic moisture, bond to dentin is more difficult than to enamel. The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to dentin using three different types of resin bondin...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Mohammad Atefat (Autor), Mostafa Sadeghi (Autor)
Formato: Livro
Publicado em: Islamic Dental Association of Iran, 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_015ec7d6d79b4d50bdd44ae2f0d96751
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Mohammad Atefat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mostafa Sadeghi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Generations of Resin Bonding Agents and Glass Ionomer to Dentin 
260 |b Islamic Dental Association of Iran,   |c 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2383-3041 
500 |a 2383-3041 
520 |a Background and Aim: Due to specific properties of dentin, such as tubular structure and intrinsic moisture, bond to dentin is more difficult than to enamel. The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to dentin using three different types of resin bonding agents and a glass ionomer-based adhesive. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 72 premolar teeth without caries or resto-rations were selected and randomly divided into six groups of 12. The first group (I) was chosen as the control group and received no preparation of dentin surface. The remaining groups received application of Single Bond (group II), OptiBond XTR (group III), All-in-One (group IV) and GC Fuji Bond LC adhesive as pre-cure (group V) and co-cure (group VI) on dentin surface, respectively. The samples were stored for two weeks in water at room temperature and then their SBS was measured using Zwick universal testing ma-chine with a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Statistical data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tamhane's T2 test. Results: The group bonded with OptiBond XTR had the maximum SBS (24.05±9.43 MPa) while the control group showed minimum SBS (0.68±0.32 MPa). SBS of composite resin to dentin in groups V and VI bonded with GC Fuji Bond LC adhesive was signifi-cantly lower than that in groups bonded with resin bonding agents (P<0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results, application of GC Fuji Bond LC glass ionomer adhe-sive is not recommended to bond composite to dentin. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentin bonding agent 
690 |a Fuji bond LC 
690 |a Glass ionomer 
690 |a Composite resin 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 58-63 (2015) 
787 0 |n http://jidai.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-815&slc_lang=en&sid=1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2383-3041 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2383-3041 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/015ec7d6d79b4d50bdd44ae2f0d96751  |z Connect to this object online.