The Use of Intersectional Analysis in Assessing Women's Leadership Progress in the Health Workforce in LMICs: A Review

BackgroundHuman resources are at the heart of health systems, playing a central role in their functionality globally. It is estimated that up to 70% of the health workforce are women, however, this pattern is not reflected in the leadership of health systems where women are under-represented. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zahra Zeinali (Author), Kui Muraya (Author), Sassy Molyneux (Author), Rosemary Morgan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences, 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_01f2bcc8e74a455e8a2cec77e819e56f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zahra Zeinali  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kui Muraya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sassy Molyneux  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rosemary Morgan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Use of Intersectional Analysis in Assessing Women's Leadership Progress in the Health Workforce in LMICs: A Review 
260 |b Kerman University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2322-5939 
500 |a 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.06 
520 |a BackgroundHuman resources are at the heart of health systems, playing a central role in their functionality globally. It is estimated that up to 70% of the health workforce are women, however, this pattern is not reflected in the leadership of health systems where women are under-represented. MethodsThis systematized review explored the existing literature around women's progress towards leadership in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which has used intersectional analysis. ResultsWhile there are studies that have looked at the inequities and barriers women face in progressing towards leadership positions in health systems within LMICs, none explicitly used an intersectionality framework in their approach. These studies did nevertheless show recurring barriers to health systems leadership created at the intersection of gender and social identities such as professional cadre, race/ethnicity, financial status, and culture. These barriers limit women's access to resources that improve career development, including mentorship and sponsorship opportunities, reduce value, recognition and respect at work for women, and increase the likelihood of women to take on dual burdens of professional work and childcare and domestic work, and, create biased views about effectiveness of men and women's leadership styles. An intersectional lens helps to better understand how gender intersects with other social identities which results in upholding these persisting barriers to career progression and leadership. ConclusionAs efforts to reduce gender inequity in health systems are gaining momentum, it is important to look beyond gender and take into account other intersecting social identities that create unique positionalities of privilege and/or disadvantage. This approach should be adopted across a diverse range of health systems programs and policies in an effort to strengthen gender equity in health and specifically human resources for health (HRH), and improve health system governance, functioning and outcomes. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a gender 
690 |a intersectionality 
690 |a health systems 
690 |a health workforce 
690 |a leadership 
690 |a low- and middle-income countries (lmics) 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol 11, Iss 8, Pp 1262-1273 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4009_3d4a37d74db0d8222faf56e43785909c.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2322-5939 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/01f2bcc8e74a455e8a2cec77e819e56f  |z Connect to this object online.