The combination of daptomycin with β-lactam antibiotics is more effective than daptomycin alone for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection

• Main Authors: Yu-Chung Chuang (Author), Jann-Tay Wang (Author), Jia-Ling Yang (Author), Chi-Ying Lin (Author), Sung-Hsi Huang (Author), Yee-Chun Chen (Author), Shan-Chwen Chang (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Elsevier, 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1876-0341; 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.10.017
• Keywords: Daptomycin; β-Lactam; Combination; Vancomycin-resistant enterococci; Bacteremia; Infectious and parasitic diseases; RC109-216; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: Journal of Infection and Public Health, Vol 15, Iss 12, Pp 1396-1402 (2022)

Background: The treatment options for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) are limited. A combination of daptomycin (DAP) and β-lactam (BL) has been suggested; however clinical studies supporting this are lacking. Methods: Patients with VR E. faecium bacteremia who received ≥ 8 mg/kg daptomycin for ≥ 72 h and initiated ≤ 5 days of culture collection between 2010 and 2021 were included. DAP+BL was defined as receiving BL for ≥ 24 h and within 24 h of DAP initiation. The primary endpoint was a composite clinical success (neither 14-day mortality, microbiological failure, nor change in the anti-VRE regimen). Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW). Results: A total of 430 patients were enrolled (DAP, n = 45; DAP+BL, n = 385). Clinical success was achieved in 19 (42.2%) patients in the DAP group and 244 (63.4%) in the DAP+BL group [adjusted odds ratio, 3.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61-6.33; P = 0.001]. Marginal analysis showed that the efficacy of DAP+BL was particularly significant with DAP dose ≥ 9 mg/kg and DAP minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 2 mg/L. With the balance of AIPW, standardized mean clinical success rates for DAP and DAP+BL 37.3% and 63.5%, respectively. The difference between DAP+BL and DAP was of 26.2% in favor of DAP+BL (95% CI, 10.0-42.3%; P = 0.001). Conclusions: DAP+BL was associated with a significantly higher rate of compositive clinical success than DAP for treatment of VR E. faecium bacteremia. The study suggested BL in combination with high-dose DAP for VR E. faecium bacteremia treatment, especially when VRE showed a high DAP MIC.