Evaluating the impact and cost-effectiveness of chlamydia management strategies in Hong Kong: A modeling study

• Main Authors: Sandra Montes-Olivas (Author), Yaz Ozten (Author), Martin Homer (Author), Katy Turner (Author), Christopher K. Fairley (Author), Jane S. Hocking (Author), Desiree Tse (Author), Nicolas Verschueren van Rees (Author), William C. W. Wong (Author), Jason J. Ong (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 2296-2565; 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932096
• Keywords: chlamydia; cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; dynamic network models; stochastic model; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2022)

ObjectivesTo illustrate the epidemiologic and cost-effectiveness impact of shifting the focus from population-based screening toward a targeted management approach for genital chlamydia infection.DesignModeling study, implementing an individual-based, stochastic, dynamic network model.SettingHong Kong.PopulationA hypothetical sample network of 10,000 people with a partnership distribution based on Hong Kong's sexually active population of reproductive age (age 18-49 years).InterventionsIn this study, we present several scenarios with different implementations of universal vs. targeted screening (based on partner numbers). We also explored the impact of (1) screening only, (2) screening plus expedited partner therapy, and (3) screening plus partner testing.Primary outcome measuresChange of chlamydia prevalence before and after implementing the different strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis reports total direct cost from a health provider perspective, the QALYs gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).ResultsIn comparing the effects of universal screening only and targeted screening of the high-risk population, the mean prevalence during the 10th year of intervention was 2.75 ± 0.30% and 2.35 ± 0.21%, respectively (compared with 3.24 ± 0.30% and 3.35 ± 0.21% before the interventions, respectively). The addition of contact tracing to the latter targeted screening scenario reduces the mean prevalence during the 10th year of intervention to 1.48 ± 0.13% (compared with 3.31 ± 0.33% at baseline) in the best-case of testing before treatment and maximal contact-tracing effectiveness (40%). Overall, the most effective scenarios were those for which interventions focused on the high-risk population defined by the number of partners, with contact tracing included. The ICER for targeted screening with contact tracing at 20% and 40% efficiency was $4,634 and $7,219 per QALY gained, respectively (10-year time horizon). Expedited partner therapy did not significantly impact overall chlamydia prevalence and caused overtreatment.ConclusionsOur study suggests that targeted screening with strengthened contact tracing efforts is the most cost-effective strategy to reduce the prevalence of chlamydia in Hong Kong.