Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study
Objective: This study compared third molar angulation and eruption status in Class I and II malocclusions after orthodontic treatment with and without first premolar extractions. Methods: The sample comprised 93 patients divided into four groups: Group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with first prem...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi,
2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_06a5f4f0a51d4f2a9ef2c748d6af1e24 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Danelin Peña-Reyes |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jessica Quereza Freitas |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Guilherme Janson |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marcos Roberto Freitas |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study |
260 | |b Galenos Yayinevi, |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2148-9505 | ||
500 | |a 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.160 | ||
520 | |a Objective: This study compared third molar angulation and eruption status in Class I and II malocclusions after orthodontic treatment with and without first premolar extractions. Methods: The sample comprised 93 patients divided into four groups: Group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; Group 2, Class I malocclusion treated without extractions; Group 3, Class II malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; and Group 4, Class II malocclusion treated without extractions. Panoramic radiographs were used to evaluate the third molar mesiodistal angulations at T1 (pretreatment), T2 (posttreatment), and T3 (long-term posttreatment). Third molar eruption status was assessed in dental casts. Intergroup angulations and eruption status comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. Results: Significantly greater mesial angulation and percentage of erupted right maxillary third molars were observed in the Class I extraction group. Significantly greater eruption status of the right mandibular third molars was observed in the Class I and Class II malocclusion extraction groups. Conclusion: Class I and II malocclusion extraction treatment exhibited more favorable angulations and a greater number of erupted third molars than non-extraction treatment. The non-extraction groups exhibited a greater percentage of unerupted third molars. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a molar | ||
690 | |a tooth | ||
690 | |a unerupted | ||
690 | |a tooth eruption | ||
690 | |a ectopic | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 37, Iss 1, Pp 7-13 (2024) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/third-molar-comparison-in-class--and--extraction-a/64839 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/06a5f4f0a51d4f2a9ef2c748d6af1e24 |z Connect to this object online. |