Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

Objective: This study compared third molar angulation and eruption status in Class I and II malocclusions after orthodontic treatment with and without first premolar extractions. Methods: The sample comprised 93 patients divided into four groups: Group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with first prem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danelin Peña-Reyes (Author), Jessica Quereza Freitas (Author), Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas (Author), Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira (Author), Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo (Author), Guilherme Janson (Author), Marcos Roberto Freitas (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Galenos Yayinevi, 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_06a5f4f0a51d4f2a9ef2c748d6af1e24
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Danelin Peña-Reyes  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jessica Quereza Freitas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Guilherme Janson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcos Roberto Freitas  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study 
260 |b Galenos Yayinevi,   |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2148-9505 
500 |a 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.160 
520 |a Objective: This study compared third molar angulation and eruption status in Class I and II malocclusions after orthodontic treatment with and without first premolar extractions. Methods: The sample comprised 93 patients divided into four groups: Group 1, Class I malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; Group 2, Class I malocclusion treated without extractions; Group 3, Class II malocclusion treated with first premolar extractions; and Group 4, Class II malocclusion treated without extractions. Panoramic radiographs were used to evaluate the third molar mesiodistal angulations at T1 (pretreatment), T2 (posttreatment), and T3 (long-term posttreatment). Third molar eruption status was assessed in dental casts. Intergroup angulations and eruption status comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. Results: Significantly greater mesial angulation and percentage of erupted right maxillary third molars were observed in the Class I extraction group. Significantly greater eruption status of the right mandibular third molars was observed in the Class I and Class II malocclusion extraction groups. Conclusion: Class I and II malocclusion extraction treatment exhibited more favorable angulations and a greater number of erupted third molars than non-extraction treatment. The non-extraction groups exhibited a greater percentage of unerupted third molars. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a molar 
690 |a tooth 
690 |a unerupted 
690 |a tooth eruption 
690 |a ectopic 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 37, Iss 1, Pp 7-13 (2024) 
787 0 |n  http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/third-molar-comparison-in-class--and--extraction-a/64839  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/06a5f4f0a51d4f2a9ef2c748d6af1e24  |z Connect to this object online.