Evaluation of the pattern dimensions of cast-metal posts in uniradicular teeth

Introduction Accurate dimensions of cast-metal posts are relevant to the survival of dental prostheses. Objective The aim of this study was to verify if the dimensions of cast-metal posts accord with ideal clinical criteria. Material and method For the evaluation, 285 periapical radiographs, from a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael de Assunção Vital (Author), Jessica Silva Ribeiro (Author), Sicknan Soares da Rocha (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_06aec5af1d2f4cc7818dba085b8f33f6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rafael de Assunção Vital  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jessica Silva Ribeiro  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sicknan Soares da Rocha  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of the pattern dimensions of cast-metal posts in uniradicular teeth 
260 |b Universidade Estadual Paulista. 
500 |a 1807-2577 
500 |a 10.1590/1807-2577.1066 
520 |a Introduction Accurate dimensions of cast-metal posts are relevant to the survival of dental prostheses. Objective The aim of this study was to verify if the dimensions of cast-metal posts accord with ideal clinical criteria. Material and method For the evaluation, 285 periapical radiographs, from a total of 80 teeth, were taken from the charts of patients that attended the clinics at the Dental School of the Federal University of Goiás, from March 2008 to October 2012. Only periapical radiographs of single-rooted teeth with post and core were included in the study. The radiographic evaluation was conducted with the assistance of a magnifying glass and a view box, in a room with low luminosity. The dimensions of the post and core were established with the help of a digital caliper, and the following measurements were considered: a) LR (Length Remnant); b) LP (Length Post); c) BS (Bone Support); d) DR (Diameter Root); e) DP (mesiodistal diameter post). The post and core were classified as acceptable or deficient by reference values with a margin of error of 0.2 mm. For descriptive analysis, the data were cataloged using SPSS software (version 17.0). Result With regard to the length of the post and core, only 26.25% and 43.75% of the post and core were classified as acceptable according to the two-thirds rule and fulcrum dental rule, respectively. With regard to the mesiodistal diameter of the post and core, 55% were classified as acceptable. Conclusion Within the limits of this study, it can be concluded that the cast-metal posts evaluated do not accord with the ideal clinical criteria. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Post and core technique 
690 |a quality control 
690 |a partial fixed denture 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista de Odontologia da UNESP, Vol 44, Iss 2, Pp 99-102 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772015000200099&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1807-2577 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/06aec5af1d2f4cc7818dba085b8f33f6  |z Connect to this object online.