A comparative study on microwave and routine tissue processing

Aim and Objective: The present study was aimed at assessing the rapid microwave-assisted tissue processing and staining to determine if it can replace standard formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded processing and staining technique. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 15 oral mucosal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T Mahesh Babu (Author), N Malathi (Author), K T Magesh (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0724ff721a9c4050a8af708b09a0cdfa
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a T Mahesh Babu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a N Malathi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a K T Magesh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A comparative study on microwave and routine tissue processing 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0970-9290 
500 |a 1998-3603 
500 |a 10.4103/0970-9290.79975 
520 |a Aim and Objective: The present study was aimed at assessing the rapid microwave-assisted tissue processing and staining to determine if it can replace standard formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded processing and staining technique. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 15 oral mucosal biopsies. The specimens were fixed in 10% formalin for 24 hours to ensure adequate fixation and their gross features were recorded, photographed, and then the specimens were cut into equal halves to be processed by both conventional and microwave histoprocessing methods and then subsequently stained with H and E by microwave and conventional methods. The stained slides in each group processed by both microwave and routine methods were randomly numbered for a blind study and circulated among six observers. All the observers were asked to grade each parameter into Excellent/Good/Average/Poor in a data sheet comprising a total of six parameters. These gradings were given a numerical value of 4, 3, 2 and 1, respectively. The parameters included in the data sheet were cellular clarity, cytoplasmic details, nuclear details, color intensity, interface of epithelium and connective tissue. Wilcoxon-matched pairs signed rank test (non-parametric) was used to calculate the test of significance (P value). Results: The total processing time involved in microwave was 42 minutes and 270 minutes for the conventional method. H and E staining in microwave took 33 minutes and 40 minutes for conventional method. Conclusions: The individual scores by different observers regarding the various parameters included in the study were statistically insignificant, the overall quality of microwave-processed and microwave-stained slides appeared slightly better than conventionally processed and stained slides. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Comparative study 
690 |a microwave tissue processing 
690 |a turn-around time 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Journal of Dental Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 50-55 (2011) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2011;volume=22;issue=1;spage=50;epage=55;aulast=Babu 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0970-9290 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-3603 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0724ff721a9c4050a8af708b09a0cdfa  |z Connect to this object online.