Diversity, friction, and harmonisation: an ethnographic study of interprofessional teamwork dynamics

Abstract Background Although diversity, friction, and harmonisation in interprofessional teamwork are aspects frequently conceptualised, no empirical study discusses them in combination. Focusing on risk and function with respect to each aspect, this article empirically examines how dynamics between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henriette Lund Skyberg (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_07a9c58eeb4743b9892be9f5b0973cb7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Henriette Lund Skyberg  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Diversity, friction, and harmonisation: an ethnographic study of interprofessional teamwork dynamics 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-022-07596-0 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Background Although diversity, friction, and harmonisation in interprofessional teamwork are aspects frequently conceptualised, no empirical study discusses them in combination. Focusing on risk and function with respect to each aspect, this article empirically examines how dynamics between these aspects during interprofessional teamwork interactions fosters conditions for effective teamwork. Methods An ethnographic study of three interprofessional teams, in the context of mental health and substance use, was conducted in Norway. Data were collected through observations of 14 team meetings and 18 in-depth interviews with health and social work professionals. Thematic analysis was applied to code the data. Results A conceptual ideal-type model, which includes all three aspects was developed to represent the emergent findings. The results suggest that the diversity of professional perspectives inherent in interprofessional teams is the foundation of interprofessional teamwork. However, friction is needed to promote innovation, encourage new insights, and intensify discussions. In addition, harmonisation balances professional distinctions, fosters trust, and ties professionals together. Conclusion This article presents a comprehensive model of how professionals work together in interprofessional teams. The model makes visible the functions and risks of each aspect and the dynamics between them. Furthermore, the article argues for mobilisation and balance of all three aspects in combination to maximise the capacity of interprofessional teamwork. Such insight can be used to support the development and successful implementation of interprofessional teamwork in health care. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Interprofessionalism 
690 |a Teamwork 
690 |a Team dynamics 
690 |a Health services 
690 |a Social work 
690 |a Ideal-type model 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07596-0 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/07a9c58eeb4743b9892be9f5b0973cb7  |z Connect to this object online.