Effect of regional vs general anesthesia on vital functions after cesarean section: a single center experience
Background The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section. Methods Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group,
2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background The aim was to determine the effect of regional anesthesia (RA) on postoperative vital functions in contrast to general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) after the cesarean section. Methods Prospective cohort study included consecutive term pregnant women delivered by cesarean section (GEA, n = 284; RA, n = 249). Results Higher levels of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as lower levels of pulse oximetry were found for GEA in contrast to RA (p < 0.001). The application of RA presented less side-effects (p < 0.05). Conclusions RA for cesarean section should be preferred when balancing the risks and benefits for the mother and fetus. |
---|---|
Item Description: | 1064-1955 1525-6065 10.1080/10641955.2022.2124417 |