Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view
Although mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose g...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Association for Learning Technology,
2011-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_08536548b52e432cbb72c0633650ffac | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Alexandre Borovik |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Information technology in university-level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician's point of view |
260 | |b Association for Learning Technology, |c 2011-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.3402/rlt.v19i1.17106 | ||
500 | |a 2156-7069 | ||
500 | |a 2156-7077 | ||
520 | |a Although mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose generic approaches toteaching, including excessively generalist, content-free, one-size-fits-allpromotion of information and communications technology. This stance is fullyexpressed, for example, in the recent Teaching Position Statement from the LondonMathematical Society (2010) and is supported by a recent report from the NationalUnion of Students (2010, 5): “Not every area of study needed or was compatiblewith e-learning, and so to assume it would grant blanket advantages was notaccurate”. This paper is an attempt to explain mathematicians' selectivity in use ofinformation and communications technology and its guiding principles. The paperis addressed to our non-mathematician colleagues and is not intended to be a surveyof the existing software and courseware for mathematics teaching – the corpus ofexisting solutions is enormous and its discussion inevitably involves hardcoremathematics. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a mathematics | ||
690 | |a university | ||
690 | |a information technology | ||
690 | |a Education | ||
690 | |a L | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Research in Learning Technology, Vol 19, Iss 1 (2011) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/17106 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7069 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2156-7077 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/08536548b52e432cbb72c0633650ffac |z Connect to this object online. |