The Comparison Between Principals Management Styles In Schools, General Public sample, Nonprofit, Gifted High school Teachers' views of downtown Tehran

The present study compared management styles in types of boy regular, public sample, non-profit and gifted high schools based on view of teachers in Tehran.This research is functional in terms of goal and descriptive - survey in terms of data collection method. . The statistical population included...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: علیرضا جوان بخت (Author), محمد یمنی دوزی سرخابی (Author), Abasalt Khorasani (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Allameh Tabataba'i University Press, 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0902b8b4773d4a7d8d01ad6d0e8e2e7d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a علیرضا جوان بخت  |e author 
700 1 0 |a محمد یمنی دوزی سرخابی  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Abasalt Khorasani  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Comparison Between Principals Management Styles In Schools, General Public sample, Nonprofit, Gifted High school Teachers' views of downtown Tehran 
260 |b Allameh Tabataba'i University Press,   |c 2016-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2476-6372 
500 |a 2476-5872 
500 |a 10.22054/jrlat.2018.2876.1070 
520 |a The present study compared management styles in types of boy regular, public sample, non-profit and gifted high schools based on view of teachers in Tehran.This research is functional in terms of goal and descriptive - survey in terms of data collection method. . The statistical population included all secondary school teachers (regular, non-profit, gifted and sample public) in Tehran boys in the 2012-2013 school years. According to the Morgan Table, 165 public high school teachers, 201 non-profit high school teachers, 28 gifted high school teachers and 73 public sample were selected as a sample. The Clustered and Classified sampling methods were used in this study and the research instrument was questionnaire that its validity and reliability were acceptable. For data analysis, descriptive statistics (such as diagrams, frequency, percentage, mean) and inferential statistics(one-way analysis of variance test, LSD post hoc test, one sample T test and chi-square test were used. in general, the following results were obtained: 1-There are Significant difference in the usage of relationship-oriented and task-oriented management styles in the public, non-profit, public sample and gifted high schools. 2-There is no significant relationship between management styles and the type of schools. 3-there are no significant differences between dominant styles of management in the public, public sample , gifted Schools but there are significant differences in the non-profit schools so that the average relationship-oriented style is more than task-oriented style. 
546 |a FA 
690 |a management styles 
690 |a management 
690 |a high school 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pizhūhish/hā-yi rahbarī va mudīriyyat-i āmūzishī, Vol 2, Iss 7, Pp 37-56 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://jrlat.atu.ac.ir/article_8544_450bbda9b67494a4a406aab974c9aca7.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2476-6372 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2476-5872 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0902b8b4773d4a7d8d01ad6d0e8e2e7d  |z Connect to this object online.