Elastic modulus and flexural strength comparisons of high-impact and traditional denture base acrylic resins

Background: Fractures of acrylic resin dentures are a common occurrence in clinical dentistry. The denture may be fractured accidentally when dropped or while in service in the mouth due to flexural fatigue. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the elastic modulus and the flexural streng...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nour M. Ajaj-ALKordy (Author), Mohannad H. Alsaadi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Fractures of acrylic resin dentures are a common occurrence in clinical dentistry. The denture may be fractured accidentally when dropped or while in service in the mouth due to flexural fatigue. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the elastic modulus and the flexural strength between two heat-cured acrylic resins used in denture bases: a high-impact resin (Lucitone 199) and a traditional resin (Rodex). Materials and methods: Rectangular strips of Lucitone 199 and Rodex (10 samples each) were fabricated and stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 2 weeks. The specimens were subjected to a three-point flexural test. The data were statistically analysed with Student's t-test (p ⩽ .05). Results: The high-impact acrylic resin had a lower elastic modulus (p = .000) and higher flexural strength (p = .001) compared to the traditional acrylic resin. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the high-impact acrylic resin is a suitable denture base material for patients with clinical fracture of the acrylic denture. Keywords: Denture, Acrylic resin, Fracture, High-impact, Elastic modulus, Flexural strength
Item Description:1013-9052
10.1016/j.sdentj.2013.12.005