Efficacy of 1.23% APF gel applications on incipient carious lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 1.23% APF gel application on the arrest of active incipient carious lesions in children. Sixty 7- to 12-year-old children, with active incipient lesions were included in the study. Children were divided randomly i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Laura Menezes Bonow (Author), Marina Sousa Azevedo (Author), Marília Leão Goettems (Author), Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica, 2013-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_09b004c0f7f9429fb0a91db7f2bcffa4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maria Laura Menezes Bonow  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marina Sousa Azevedo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marília Leão Goettems  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy of 1.23% APF gel applications on incipient carious lesions: a double-blind randomized clinical trial 
260 |b Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica,   |c 2013-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1806-8324 
520 |a The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 1.23% APF gel application on the arrest of active incipient carious lesions in children. Sixty 7- to 12-year-old children, with active incipient lesions were included in the study. Children were divided randomly into 2 groups: 1.23% APF gel and placebo gel applications. Each group received 8 weekly applications of treatment. The lesions were re-evaluated at the 4th and 8th appointments. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate relative risks of the presence of active white spot lesions. Groups showed similar results (PR = 1.67; CI 95% 0.69–3.98). The persistence of at least 1 active lesion was associated with a higher number of lesions in the baseline (PR = 2.67; CI 95% 1.19–6.03), but not with sugar intake (PR = 1.06; CI 95% 0.56–2.86) and previous exposure to fluoride dentifrice (PR = 1.26; CI 95% 0.49–2.29). The trial demonstrates the equivalence of the treatments. The use of the APF gel showed no additional benefits in this sample of children exposed to fluoridated water and dentifrice. The professional dental plaque removal in both groups may also account for the resulting equivalence of the treatments. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Fluorides, Topical 
690 |a Dental Caries 
690 |a Toothbrushing 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Brazilian Oral Research, Vol 27, Iss 3, Pp 279-285 (2013) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000300279 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1806-8324 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/09b004c0f7f9429fb0a91db7f2bcffa4  |z Connect to this object online.