Instrument for assessing the quality of mobile emergency pre-hospital care: content validation
OBJECTIVES To validate an instrument to assess quality of mobile emergency pre-hospital care. METHOD A methodological study where 20 professionals gave their opinions on the items of the proposed instrument. The analysis was performed using Kappa test (K) and Content Validity Index (CVI), considerin...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
SciELO,
2015-06-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_0b04c9fc3e304e57ab922f5d3cde0eb0 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Rodrigo Assis Neves Dantas |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Gilson de Vasconcelos Torres |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marina de Góes Salvetti |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Daniele Vieira Dantas |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ana Elza Oliveira de Mendonça |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Instrument for assessing the quality of mobile emergency pre-hospital care: content validation |
260 | |b SciELO, |c 2015-06-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1980-220X | ||
500 | |a 10.1590/S0080-623420150000300004 | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES To validate an instrument to assess quality of mobile emergency pre-hospital care. METHOD A methodological study where 20 professionals gave their opinions on the items of the proposed instrument. The analysis was performed using Kappa test (K) and Content Validity Index (CVI), considering K> 0.80 and CVI ≥ 0.80. RESULTS Three items were excluded from the instrument: Professional Compensation; Job Satisfaction and Services Performed. Items that obtained adequate K and CVI indexes and remained in the instrument were: ambulance conservation status; physical structure; comfort in the ambulance; availability of material resources; user/staff safety; continuous learning; safety demonstrated by the team; access; welcoming; humanization; response time; costumer privacy; guidelines on care; relationship between professionals and costumers; opportunity for costumers to make complaints and multiprofessional conjunction/actuation. CONCLUSION The instrument to assess quality of care has been validated and may contribute to the evaluation of pre-hospital care in mobile emergency services. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a ES | ||
546 | |a PT | ||
690 | |a Enfermería de Urgencia | ||
690 | |a Atención Prehospitalaria | ||
690 | |a Estudios de Validación | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
690 | |a Nursing | ||
690 | |a RT1-120 | ||
690 | |a Mental healing | ||
690 | |a RZ400-408 | ||
690 | |a Education (General) | ||
690 | |a L7-991 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, Vol 49, Iss 3, Pp 380-386 (2015) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000300380&lng=en&tlng=en | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1980-220X | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0b04c9fc3e304e57ab922f5d3cde0eb0 |z Connect to this object online. |