Do patients' preferences prevail in hospital selection?: a comparison between discrete choice experiments and revealed hospital choice

Abstract Background In patient choice, patients are expected to select the provider that best fits their preferences. In this study, we assess to what extent the hospital choice of patients in practice corresponds with their preferred choice. Methods Dutch patients with breast cancer (n = 631) and c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin H. Salampessy (Author), David Ikkersheim (Author), France R. M. Portrait (Author), Xander Koolman (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0b7ce3de0a9a4e4cb15afe15a961d451
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Benjamin H. Salampessy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Ikkersheim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a France R. M. Portrait  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xander Koolman  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Do patients' preferences prevail in hospital selection?: a comparison between discrete choice experiments and revealed hospital choice 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-022-08403-6 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Background In patient choice, patients are expected to select the provider that best fits their preferences. In this study, we assess to what extent the hospital choice of patients in practice corresponds with their preferred choice. Methods Dutch patients with breast cancer (n = 631) and cataract (n = 1109) were recruited. We employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) per condition to measure stated preferences and predict the distribution of patients across four hospitals. Each DCE included five attributes: patient experiences, a clinical outcome indicator, waiting time, travel distance and whether the hospital had been recommended (e.g., by the General Practitioner (GP)). Revealed choices were derived from claims data. Results Hospital quality was valued as most important in the DCE; the largest marginal rates of substitution (willingness to wait) were observed for the clinical outcome indicator (breast cancer: 38.6 days (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 32.9-44.2); cataract: 210.5 days (95%CI: 140.8-280.2)). In practice, it was of lesser importance. In revealed choices, travel distance became the most important attribute; it accounted for 85.5% (breast cancer) and 95.5% (cataract) of the log-likelihood. The predicted distribution of patients differed from that observed in practice in terms of absolute value and, for breast cancer, also in relative order. Similar results were observed in population weighted analyses. Discussion Study findings show that patients highly valued quality information in the choice for a hospital. However, in practice these preferences did not prevail. Our findings suggest that GPs played a major role and that patients mostly ended up selecting the nearest hospital. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Discrete choice experiment 
690 |a Patient preferences 
690 |a Choice behavior 
690 |a Hospital 
690 |a Quality of care 
690 |a Revealed and stated preferences 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08403-6 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0b7ce3de0a9a4e4cb15afe15a961d451  |z Connect to this object online.