Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study
ABSTRACT Introduction: Although self-ligating brackets presumably provide better hygiene conditions, no consensus has been reached so far. Objective: Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in an in vitro experimental design, the adherence of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in self-ligatin...
Сохранить в:
Главные авторы: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Формат: | |
Опубликовано: |
Dental Press Editora,
2021-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Предметы: | |
Online-ссылка: | Connect to this object online. |
Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_0ba53480d34d4eee9f46c8c2ea4307c4 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Murilo Fernando Neuppmann FERES |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Fernanda VICIONI-MARQUES |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Fábio Lourenço ROMANO |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marina Guimarães ROSCOE |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Vinícius Matsuzaki de SOUZA |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Aline Lira TORNERI |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Bruno BUENO-SILVA |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study |
260 | |b Dental Press Editora, |c 2021-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 2177-6709 | ||
500 | |a 10.1590/2177-6709.26.6.e212019.oar | ||
520 | |a ABSTRACT Introduction: Although self-ligating brackets presumably provide better hygiene conditions, no consensus has been reached so far. Objective: Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in an in vitro experimental design, the adherence of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in self-ligating and conventional brackets of different manufacturers and ligature types. Methods: Four commercial brands of maxillary premolar metal brackets were tested (Abzil®; Morelli®; 3M Unitek®; and GAC®). Each one was subdivided into three groups, which varied according to the type of ligature and bracket model (metallic, elastic, and self-ligating), totalizing twelve groups, composed of six brackets each. Previously sterilized brackets were initially immersed in saliva for one hour, and subsequently washed and added in a bacterial suspension, maintained in aerobiosis for 72 hours. The adhered bacteria were then separated and quantified by colony forming units (CFU/mL) counting after 48 hours of growth. The groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-hoc tests (p< 0.05). Results: Regardless of the commercial brand, self-ligating brackets had significantly less CFU/mL. However, according to comparisons performed within each commercial brand, only Abzil® self-ligating brackets had significantly lower biofilm adhesion. Among all of the self-ligating models, GAC® brackets presented the highest bacterial adhesion rate. Conclusions: Self-ligating brackets are likely to present lower rates of biofilm adhesion. Particularly, Abzil® and GAC® self-ligating brackets are less likely to accumulate biofilm. Although such results are derived from an in vitro study, practitioners might acknowledge findings concerning bacterial adhesion as one of the relevant features to be considered during bracket selection. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a PT | ||
690 | |a Orthodontic brackets | ||
690 | |a Biofilms | ||
690 | |a In vitro techniques | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 26, Iss 6 (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000600300&tlng=en | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6709 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0ba53480d34d4eee9f46c8c2ea4307c4 |z Connect to this object online. |