Patient involvement in priority-setting for medical research: A mini review of initiatives in the rare disease field

Patient involvement (PI) in determining medical research priorities is an important way to ensure that limited research funds are allocated to best serve patients. As a disease area for which research funds are limited, we see a particular utility for PI in priority-setting for medical research on r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amelia Katirai (Author), Atsushi Kogetsu (Author), Kazuto Kato (Author), Beverley Yamamoto (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0cb7a0972e9e4edaadd0cf5d8924ed9f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amelia Katirai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Atsushi Kogetsu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kazuto Kato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Beverley Yamamoto  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Patient involvement in priority-setting for medical research: A mini review of initiatives in the rare disease field 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-07-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2296-2565 
500 |a 10.3389/fpubh.2022.915438 
520 |a Patient involvement (PI) in determining medical research priorities is an important way to ensure that limited research funds are allocated to best serve patients. As a disease area for which research funds are limited, we see a particular utility for PI in priority-setting for medical research on rare diseases. In this review, we argue that PI initiatives are an important form of evidence for policymaking. We conducted a study to identify the extent to which PI initiatives are being conducted in the rare disease field, the features of such initiatives, the trends in the priorities elicited, and the extent to which translation into policy is reported in the academic literature. Here, we report the results of this exploratory review of the English-language literature gathered through online databases and search engines, with the aim of identifying journal articles published prior to December 2020, describing PI initiatives focused on determining priorities for medical research funding in the rare disease field. We identified seven recently-published articles and found that the majority made use of structured methodologies to ensure the robustness of the evidence produced, but found little reported practical implementation or concrete plans for implementation of the results of the initiatives. We conclude that priority-setting initiatives are meaningful mechanisms for involving patients in determining research directions. However, we highlight the importance of translation into policy as a necessary next step to fully utilize the results and move beyond well-intentioned exercises. Finally, we draw attention to the benefits of involving patients throughout this process. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a rare disease (RD) 
690 |a patient involvement 
690 |a priority-setting 
690 |a medical research 
690 |a review 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Public Health, Vol 10 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.915438/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2296-2565 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0cb7a0972e9e4edaadd0cf5d8924ed9f  |z Connect to this object online.