Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells and Atypical Glandular Cells: Similar but Dissimilar

Since 1988 when the Bethesda System (TBS) was first adopted(1), two modifications were subsequently carried out in 1991 and 2001(2,3). One of the major changes in TBS 2001 is the revision of a terminology used for atypical squamous and glandular cells. TBS 2001 replaced "atypical squamous cells...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siriwan Tangjitgamol (Author), Kaimook Gosinthrajit (Author)
Format: Book
Published: The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2011-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_0cefc935374c4111b4c7c3641bab39a9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Siriwan Tangjitgamol  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kaimook Gosinthrajit  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells and Atypical Glandular Cells: Similar but Dissimilar 
260 |b The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,   |c 2011-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0857-6084 
500 |a 0857-6084 
520 |a Since 1988 when the Bethesda System (TBS) was first adopted(1), two modifications were subsequently carried out in 1991 and 2001(2,3). One of the major changes in TBS 2001 is the revision of a terminology used for atypical squamous and glandular cells. TBS 2001 replaced "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)" and "atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS or AGCUS)" in TBS 1988 and 1991 with simply "atypical squamous cells (ASC)" and "atypical glandular cells (AGC)", respectively. Attempts have always been made to qualify or subcategorize these equivocal diagnoses in a manner to indicate that it can define a patient at increased risk of significant clinical lesions which generally include high grade pre-invasive and invasive cancers. These two acronyms are similar for being classified as cells which are more atypical than reactive response but are not justified to be classified as preinvasive or invasive lesions. However, they are dissimilar in terms of having different cytologic backgrounds and underlying histopathology as well as clinical implication. When these abnormal cytologic diagnoses and their qualifiers or subcategories are given, a gynecologist who confronts with the women should thoroughly understand the messages from a cytopathologist through his/ her report of these cytologic interpretations. Some important issues of these two particular cytologic abnormalities will be briefly pointed out here in a light of hope that this will lead to an optimal management for a woman. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Atypical Squamous Cells 
690 |a Atypical Glandular Cells 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol 19, Iss 2, Pp 81-87 (2011) 
787 0 |n https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/1256/1017/ 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0857-6084 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0857-6084 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/0cefc935374c4111b4c7c3641bab39a9  |z Connect to this object online.