New Hypotheses and Unanswered Questions in Running Injury Research - comment on Nigg et al.
After critical evaluation of the evidence, Nigg et al.'s target article reject currently discussed hypotheses regarding relationships between impact forces, pronation, and running injuries. In doing so, they highlight methodological questions underlying research in this field. This commentary...
Saved in:
Main Author: | James Becker (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Bern Open Publishing,
2018-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A paradigm shift is necessary to relate running injury risk and footwear design - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Joseph Hamill, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reconciling new with old injury paradigms and the need to dig deeper - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Max R. Paquette, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Running impact forces: from half a leg to holistic understanding - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Kenneth P. Clark, et al.
Published: (2018) -
New paradigms in running injury prevention - Benno M. Nigg on target
by: Markus Tilp (Ed.)
Published: (2018) -
A discussion of the Muscle Tuning and the Preferred Movement Path concepts - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Peter Federolf, et al.
Published: (2018)