Enseigner et apprendre en présentiel

The article deals with the traditional format of teaching and learning from the point of view of its quality, in particular the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face education in comparison with online training. The purpose is to check whether the classroom training process is of better quali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liudmyla Holubnycha (Author), Tetiana Shchokina (Author), Natalia Soroka (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1064abced82d4574a3b6eb6c68d7bfa4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Liudmyla Holubnycha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tetiana Shchokina  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Natalia Soroka  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Enseigner et apprendre en présentiel 
260 |b Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée. 
500 |a 2271-6092 
500 |a 10.4000/11w1y 
520 |a The article deals with the traditional format of teaching and learning from the point of view of its quality, in particular the advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face education in comparison with online training. The purpose is to check whether the classroom training process is of better quality than online teaching and learning on the basis of the real case of teaching English at Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. The tasks are to find out the pluses of offline training in comparison with the online format; to reveal the minuses of the traditional educational form in comparison with the online format on the basis of real teaching experience; and to check whether the pluses or the minuses of offline training have a greater influence on intermediate students' learning results. The investigation methods are empirical methods (surveys, observation) and general theoretical methods (analysis, syntheses and comparison). The results exposed the following: 1) benefits of face-to-face training: real-time interaction, improvement of social skills, collaboration, organization, motivation, accessibility, and better assessment; 2) cons of face-to-face training: processing a smaller capacity of programme material; problems with discipline; impossibility of listening to the lesson material repeatedly if necessary; problems with access to learning material from the internet; and the tendency of some students to have a psychological barrier to speaking a foreign language "live" in front of other students; and 3) the intermediate students' learning results demonstrated that offline students have worse academic progress than the students studying online. The conclusion is that the minuses of offline training have a greater influence on students' learning results than the pluses do. In order to conclude which format of education is of better quality, it is necessary to continue investigating the problem. 
546 |a FR 
690 |a Education 
690 |a Face-to-Face Education 
690 |a Teaching and Learning Formats 
690 |a Online Training 
690 |a Quality of Education 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Special aspects of education 
690 |a LC8-6691 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Éducation et Socialisation, Vol 72 
787 0 |n https://journals.openedition.org/edso/27542 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2271-6092 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1064abced82d4574a3b6eb6c68d7bfa4  |z Connect to this object online.