Effects of Blended Learning in Physical Education among University Students: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Blended learning (BL) models have attracted the attention of university teachers and students worldwide in recent years. However, systematic reviews related to the effectiveness of BL in university physical education are lacking. (2) Purpose: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Wang (Author), Roxana Dev Omar Dev (Author), Kim Geok Soh (Author), Nasnoor Juzaily Mohd Nasiruddin (Author), Yuansheng Wang (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_10e38b27e8714eb8a6e7fb13c55f7660
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Chen Wang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roxana Dev Omar Dev  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kim Geok Soh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nasnoor Juzaily Mohd Nasiruddin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yuansheng Wang  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effects of Blended Learning in Physical Education among University Students: A Systematic Review 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/educsci12080530 
500 |a 2227-7102 
520 |a (1) Background: Blended learning (BL) models have attracted the attention of university teachers and students worldwide in recent years. However, systematic reviews related to the effectiveness of BL in university physical education are lacking. (2) Purpose: Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of BL in physical education among university students. (3) Methods: Searches were conducted in the following five databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost (SPORTDiscus), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies and the quality of this study was fair (range 4-5). (4) Results: All reported sports included basketball (<i>n</i> = 6), badminton (<i>n</i> = 3), dance (<i>n</i> = 3), volleyball (<i>n</i> = 1), yoga (<i>n</i> = 1), aerobics (<i>n</i> = 1), Taiji (<i>n</i> = 1), swimming (<i>n</i> = 1), and tennis (<i>n</i> = 1). Seventeen studies described the effect of BL on students' motor skills, and the results showed that BL had a greater effect on basic skills, but the improvement was not significant for combination techniques. There were three studies related to physical fitness. Studies have observed significant effects on lung capacity (<i>n</i> = 1), sit and reach (<i>n</i> = 1), pull-ups (<i>n</i> = 1), 1000 m (<i>n</i> = 3), and 800 m (<i>n</i> = 1). However, there was no significant difference in body weight (<i>n</i> = 1) or standing long jump (<i>n</i> = 1). In addition, two articles examined the impact of BL on sitting up, but the findings were the opposite. Six studies reported on exercise attitude and the results demonstrated that BL can significantly improve students' learning attitude, target attitude, behavioral cognition, and emotional experience. However, the two articles produced different results in behavioral habits. Other results, such as satisfaction and interest in learning, were also popular topics regarding BL and were found to have improved significantly. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a blended learning 
690 |a physical education 
690 |a sports 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Sciences, Vol 12, Iss 8, p 530 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/8/530 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2227-7102 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/10e38b27e8714eb8a6e7fb13c55f7660  |z Connect to this object online.