Guided Growth Technique for Epiphysiodesis and Hemiepiphysiodesis: Safety and Performance Evaluation

Background: Guided-growth modulation is a first-line treatment widely adopted to correct lower-limb angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies (LLD) in the paediatric population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and performance of a new construct (8-Plate Plu...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro (Autor), Giovanni Trisolino (Autor), Stefano Stallone (Autor), Marco Ramella (Autor), Gino Rocca (Autor), Giovanni Gallone (Autor)
Formato: Livro
Publicado em: MDPI AG, 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1105ed1b9391418f861ab8a91e4f9ad9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Giovanni Trisolino  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Stefano Stallone  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marco Ramella  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gino Rocca  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Giovanni Gallone  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Guided Growth Technique for Epiphysiodesis and Hemiepiphysiodesis: Safety and Performance Evaluation 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2023-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/children11010049 
500 |a 2227-9067 
520 |a Background: Guided-growth modulation is a first-line treatment widely adopted to correct lower-limb angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies (LLD) in the paediatric population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and performance of a new construct (8-Plate Plus or Guided-Growth Plate System Plus, Orthofix S.r.l) used to correct angular deformities and LLD in non-skeletally mature children. The primary endpoint was safety (from plate implantation to removal). The secondary endpoint was performance; patients treated for LLD achieved complete correction if a pre- and post-surgery difference of <0 was observed; angular deformities performance was measured in terms of IMD, ICD, mMPTA, and mLDFA. Results: We performed 69 procedures in 41 patients. A total of 10 patients had an LLD, and 31 had an angular deformity. We observed nine minor complications in the hemiepiphysiodesis group. One patient experienced rebound. All 10 LLD patient treatments were successful. A total of 30/31 patients with an angular deformity had a successful treatment; the remaining patient had a partial correction. Conclusions: Guided-growth by temporary epiphysiodesis or hemiepiphysiodesis was safe and effective for angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies. Further prospective and/or randomized controlled trial studies assessing more significant cohorts of patients and a comparison group could add evidence to our findings. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a guided-growth 
690 |a angular deformity 
690 |a limb-length discrepancy 
690 |a 8-Plate Plus 
690 |a Guided-growth Plate System Plus 
690 |a GGPSP 
690 |a Pediatrics 
690 |a RJ1-570 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Children, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 49 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/1/49 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2227-9067 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1105ed1b9391418f861ab8a91e4f9ad9  |z Connect to this object online.