Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images

OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izabel Regina Fischer Rubia-Bullen (Author), Maurício Cunha Escarpinati (Author), Homero Schiabel (Author), Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira (Author), Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira (Author), José Roberto Pereira Lauris (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of São Paulo, 2007-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_11d88a2caa0f488b8c298219df00d6a3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Izabel Regina Fischer Rubia-Bullen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maurício Cunha Escarpinati  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Homero Schiabel  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Roberto Pereira Lauris  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images 
260 |b University of São Paulo,   |c 2007-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1590/S1678-77572007000100004 
500 |a 1678-7757 
500 |a 1678-7765 
520 |a OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. RESULTS: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Digital image 
690 |a Radiographic image 
690 |a Charge-coupled device 
690 |a Digital camera 
690 |a Scanner 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 14-17 (2007) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7757 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/11d88a2caa0f488b8c298219df00d6a3  |z Connect to this object online.