Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images
OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeated...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
University of São Paulo,
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_11d88a2caa0f488b8c298219df00d6a3 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Izabel Regina Fischer Rubia-Bullen |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Maurício Cunha Escarpinati |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Homero Schiabel |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a José Roberto Pereira Lauris |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Digitizing radiographic films: a simple way to evaluate indirect digital images |
260 | |b University of São Paulo, |c 2007-02-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.1590/S1678-77572007000100004 | ||
500 | |a 1678-7757 | ||
500 | |a 1678-7765 | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: This study applied a simple method to evaluate the performance of three digital devices (two scanners and one digital camera) using the reproducibility of pixel values attributed to the same radiographic image. METHODS: Using the same capture parameters, a radiographic image was repeatedly digitized in order to determine the variability of pixel values given to the image throughout the digitization process. One coefficient value was obtained and was called pixel value reproducibility. RESULTS: A significant difference in pixel values was observed among the three devices for the digitized images (ANOVA, p<0.00001). There was significant pixel value variability at the same digitization conditions for one scanner and the digital camera. CONCLUSIONS: Digital devices may assign pixel values differently in consecutive digitization depending on the optical density of the radiographic image and the equipment. The pixel value reproducibility was not satisfactory as tested for two devices. It is maybe advisable knowing the digitization variations regarding pixel values whenever using digital radiography images in longitudinal clinical examinations. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Digital image | ||
690 | |a Radiographic image | ||
690 | |a Charge-coupled device | ||
690 | |a Digital camera | ||
690 | |a Scanner | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 14-17 (2007) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000100004 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7757 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/11d88a2caa0f488b8c298219df00d6a3 |z Connect to this object online. |