Quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in general practice: a RAND Appropriateness Method

Objective: To develop quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections, tailored to the Danish general practice setting. Design: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Setting: General practice. Subjects: A panel of nine experts, mainly genera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Trolle Saust (Author), Lars Bjerrum (Author), Magnus Arpi (Author), Malene Plejdrup Hansen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_128d9de42a3a44c9a0e1d0cfb513c3f7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Laura Trolle Saust  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lars Bjerrum  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Magnus Arpi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Malene Plejdrup Hansen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in general practice: a RAND Appropriateness Method 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2017-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0281-3432 
500 |a 1502-7724 
500 |a 10.1080/02813432.2017.1333305 
520 |a Objective: To develop quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections, tailored to the Danish general practice setting. Design: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Setting: General practice. Subjects: A panel of nine experts, mainly general practitioners, was asked to rate the relevance of 64 quality indicators for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute respiratory tract infections based on guidelines. Subsequently, a face-to-face meeting was held to resolve misinterpretations and to achieve consensus. Main outcome measures: The experts were asked to rate the indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. Consensus of appropriateness for a quality indicator was reached if the overall panel median rating was 7-9 with agreement. Results: A total of 50 of the 64 proposed quality indicators attained consensus. Consensus was achieved for 12 indicators focusing on the diagnostic process and 19 indicators focusing on the decision about antibiotic treatment and choice of antibiotics, respectively. Conclusion: These newly developed quality indicators may be used to strengthen Danish general practitioners' focus on their management of patients with acute respiratory tract infections and to identify where there is a need for future quality improvements. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Antibiotics 
690 |a general practice 
690 |a respiratory tract infections 
690 |a quality indicator 
690 |a quality assessment 
690 |a primary care 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 35, Iss 2, Pp 192-200 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1333305 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/128d9de42a3a44c9a0e1d0cfb513c3f7  |z Connect to this object online.