The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city

Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnosis of Angle Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city. Materials and Methods: A sample of 170 Iraqi subjects aged 12-15 years, 85 subjects with Class III malocclusion (42 males and 43 females) were selected on the basis of molar and incisor relation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khidair A Salman (Author), Ra'ed J Sa'id (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry, 2006-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1335df222f3645519607daddebeb766c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Khidair A Salman   |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ra'ed J Sa'id   |e author 
245 0 0 |a The differential diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city 
260 |b University of Mosul, College of Dentistry,   |c 2006-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.33899/rden.2005.163266 
500 |a 1812-1217 
500 |a 1998-0345 
520 |a Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnosis of Angle Class III malocclusion in adolescents of Mosul city. Materials and Methods: A sample of 170 Iraqi subjects aged 12-15 years, 85 subjects with Class III malocclusion (42 males and 43 females) were selected on the basis of molar and incisor relationships. Eighty fife subjects with Class I normal occlusion (42 males and 43 females) were chosen. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken for each subject and thirty six measurements were determined (20 angular, 14 linear and 2 ratios). Results: There were 7 subgroups in Class III malocclusion. Pure maxillary retrognathism was the most common subgroup, which represented 31.8%; whereas pure mandibular prognathism was the second subgroup with 23.5%. When the lower anterior facial height (LAFH) was considered with both maxillary and mandibular position, 14 subgroups were found. The most common subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and normal (LAFH) with 16.5% of total sample. The second subgroup included subjects with retrognathic maxilla, normal mandible and increased (LAFH) with 15.3%. The third subgroup included subjects with normal maxilla, prognathic mandible and normal (LAFH) which represented 10.6%. Conclusion: the maxillary retrognathism is more common than mandibular prognathism in Mosul City 
546 |a AR 
546 |a EN 
690 |a differential diagnosis 
690 |a subgroups 
690 |a class iii malocclusion 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, Vol 6, Iss 3, Pp 92s-100s (2006) 
787 0 |n https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_163266_d631db914f604bba29fa5adedd191a81.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1812-1217 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-0345 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1335df222f3645519607daddebeb766c  |z Connect to this object online.