Estimating weight for multidimensional health poverty using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process: a case of China

Abstract Background Traditionally, poverty assessment has relied on a single income criterion, which is inadequate in contexts where absolute poverty has been mitigated. This study developed a weighting scheme for the Multidimensional Health Poverty Index (MHPI) based on sustainable livelihood frame...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jin Hao (Author), Shiju Dong (Author), Jiajia Li (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_13ddc029afa948ad913eb5d2380a2dcc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jin Hao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shiju Dong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jiajia Li  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Estimating weight for multidimensional health poverty using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process: a case of China 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-024-20406-y 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Background Traditionally, poverty assessment has relied on a single income criterion, which is inadequate in contexts where absolute poverty has been mitigated. This study developed a weighting scheme for the Multidimensional Health Poverty Index (MHPI) based on sustainable livelihood framework (SLF), aimed at enhancing the accuracy of poverty identification in China. Methods A two-round Delphi process was used to determine the indicators of the index system. The weight of each indicator was calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. The multidimensional poverty index incorporates SLF's five dimensions: financial, natural, physical, social, and human capital. Results The initial 46 indicators formed an indicator pool for the Delphi questionnaire. Based on the final consensus of the expert panel, the Delphi consultation resulted in an index system comprising six first-level and 23 second-level indicators. The weight values of the first-level indicators (economic security, health status, education, social capital, healthcare utilisation, and living conditions) were 0.2715, 0.2593, 0.0855, 0.0657, 0.1812, and 0.1363, respectively. Conclusion This study established a scientific and effective index to evaluate generate weight for estimating multidimensional health poverty in China. Economic security, health status, and healthcare utilisation are the most crucial aspects of multidimensional health poverty. Moreover, the results indicated that vocational training and social capital should be emphasised. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Multidimensional health poverty 
690 |a Index 
690 |a Delphi method 
690 |a Analytic hierarchy process 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20406-y 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/13ddc029afa948ad913eb5d2380a2dcc  |z Connect to this object online.