Refabrication of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis using clip attachment pickup technique

Increased patient acceptance and widespread use have led to a greater demand for refabrication of existing maxillofacial prostheses exhibiting wear and tear. Refabricating an osseointegrated implant-retained silicone auricular prosthesis on the existing Hader bar is a challenging task if it is perfo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanketh Kethireddy (Author), Keerthi Kethireddy (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_142765d244424586b520bf9b26f8b792
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sanketh Kethireddy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Keerthi Kethireddy  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Refabrication of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis using clip attachment pickup technique 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0972-4052 
500 |a 1998-4057 
500 |a 10.4103/jips.jips_227_16 
520 |a Increased patient acceptance and widespread use have led to a greater demand for refabrication of existing maxillofacial prostheses exhibiting wear and tear. Refabricating an osseointegrated implant-retained silicone auricular prosthesis on the existing Hader bar is a challenging task if it is performed without removing it. Therefore, an attachment level impression method is utilized for the refabrication of a new prosthesis on an existing Hader bar framework without removing it from the patient's defect. This case report discusses a modification of the Mahidol University technique. This modification provides a simple, speedy, and convenient method through which the relation between the metal framework and attachments could be obtained precisely. This precision allowed for easy fabrication of the acrylic housing, which in turn results in better adaptation of the auricular prosthesis to the patient's face. Therefore, this technique offers advantages to both the prosthetist in fabrication and the patient in facilitating him continue to wear his existing implant-retained prosthesis during refabrication process. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Attachment level impression 
690 |a craniofacial implants 
690 |a implant retention 
690 |a indirect acrylic housing 
690 |a silicone auricular prosthesis 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 310-315 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2017;volume=17;issue=3;spage=310;epage=315;aulast=Kethireddy 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0972-4052 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-4057 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/142765d244424586b520bf9b26f8b792  |z Connect to this object online.