Fixation duration and the learning process: an eye tracking study with subtitled videos

Learning is a complex phenomenon and education researchers are increasingly focussing on processes that go into it. Eye tracking has become an important tool in such research. In this paper, we focus on one of the most commonly used metrics in eye tracking, namely, fixation duration. Fixation durati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shivsevak Negi (Author), Ritayan Mitra (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Bern Open Publishing, 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_143a3d3e638b4c7a94e33bdea2afd2ca
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shivsevak Negi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ritayan Mitra  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Fixation duration and the learning process: an eye tracking study with subtitled videos 
260 |b Bern Open Publishing,   |c 2020-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.16910/jemr.13.6.1 
500 |a 1995-8692 
520 |a Learning is a complex phenomenon and education researchers are increasingly focussing on processes that go into it. Eye tracking has become an important tool in such research. In this paper, we focus on one of the most commonly used metrics in eye tracking, namely, fixation duration. Fixation duration has been used to study cognition and attention. However, fixation duration distributions are characteristically non-normal and heavily skewed to the right. Therefore, the use of a single average value, such as the mean fixation duration, to predict cognition and/or attention could be problematic. This is especially true in studies of complex constructs, such as learning, which are governed by both cognitive and affective processes. We collected eye tracking data from 51 students watching a 12 min long educational video with and without subtitles. The learning gain after watching the video was calculated with pre- and post-test scores. Several multiple linear regression models revealed a) fixation duration can explain a substantial fraction of variation in the pre-post data, which indicates its usefulness in the study of learning processes; b) the arithmetic mean of fixation durations, which is the most commonly reported eye tracking metric, may not be the optimal choice; and c) a phenomenological model of fixation durations where the number of fixations over different temporal ranges are used as inputs seemed to perform the best. The results and their implications for learning process research are discussed. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Learning process 
690 |a Eye tracking 
690 |a Fixation duration distribution 
690 |a Multiple linear regression 
690 |a Subtitled educational video 
690 |a Human anatomy 
690 |a QM1-695 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Eye Movement Research, Vol 13, Iss 6 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/6715 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1995-8692 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/143a3d3e638b4c7a94e33bdea2afd2ca  |z Connect to this object online.