Effects of Hydrotherapy on the Management of Childbirth and Its Outcomes-A Retrospective Cohort Study

• Main Authors: Elena Mellado-García (Author), Lourdes Díaz-Rodríguez (Author), Jonathan Cortés-Martín (Author), Juan Carlos Sánchez-García (Author), Beatriz Piqueras-Sola (Author), Juan Carlos Higuero Macías (Author), Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: MDPI AG, 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.3390/nursrep14020095; 2039-4403; 2039-439X
• Keywords: hydrotherapy; waterbirth; immersion; first labor stage; maternal health; Nursing; RT1-120
• Source: Nursing Reports, Vol 14, Iss 2, Pp 1251-1259 (2024)

The use of hydrotherapy during childbirth has gained relevance due to the demand for natural childbirth and greater respect for the woman's choice. Studies have shown benefits such as less use of epidural analgesia, increased ability to cope with pain, shorter labor, and a better overall birth experience. Objective: The main objective of this study was to generate further evidence on maternal and birth outcomes associated with the use of hydrotherapy during labor, specifically aiming to describe the effects of water immersion during all stages of labor (first, second, and third) on women. Methodology: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on a random sample of women who gave birth at the Costa del Sol Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. The calculated sample size was 377 women and the data were extracted from their partograms. After data extraction, two groups were formed: one group used hydrotherapy during childbirth (<i>n</i> = 124), while the other group included women who did not use hydrotherapy during the childbirth process (<i>n</i> = 253). Results: The results highlight significant differences in pain perception, analgesia use, types of labor, and delivery times between the two groups. Women who did not use hydrotherapy reported higher pain perception, with a median (IQR) of 8 (7-9) on a numerical scale, compared to a median (IQR) of 6 (5-7) for the hydrotherapy group. Furthermore, the group without hydrotherapy required epidural analgesia in 40% of cases, while in the hydrotherapy group, it was only necessary in 20%. In terms of the type of delivery, the hydrotherapy group had more spontaneous vaginal deliveries compared to the non-hydrotherapy group, which had more operative vaginal deliveries. The overall duration of labor was longer in the hydrotherapy group, especially in women who arrived at the hospital late in labor. Conclusions: Hydrotherapy is associated with a longer time to delivery. Women with a higher pain tolerance tend to opt for hydrotherapy instead of epidural analgesia.