Usability and performance expectancy govern spine surgeons' use of a clinical decision support system for shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of common lumbar degenerative disorders

Study designQuantitative survey study is the study design.ObjectivesThe study aims to develop a model for the factors that drive or impede the use of an artificial intelligence clinical decision support system (CDSS) called PROPOSE, which supports shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Søren Eiskjær (Author), Casper Friis Pedersen (Author), Simon Toftgaard Skov (Author), Mikkel Østerheden Andersen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_16c7a2e487cd44b0ae595f751a2f31c0
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Søren Eiskjær  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Søren Eiskjær  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Casper Friis Pedersen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Casper Friis Pedersen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Simon Toftgaard Skov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Simon Toftgaard Skov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Simon Toftgaard Skov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mikkel Østerheden Andersen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mikkel Østerheden Andersen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Usability and performance expectancy govern spine surgeons' use of a clinical decision support system for shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of common lumbar degenerative disorders 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2023-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2673-253X 
500 |a 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1225540 
520 |a Study designQuantitative survey study is the study design.ObjectivesThe study aims to develop a model for the factors that drive or impede the use of an artificial intelligence clinical decision support system (CDSS) called PROPOSE, which supports shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of ordinary spinal disorders.MethodsA total of 62 spine surgeons were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their behavioral intention to use the CDSS after being introduced to PROPOSE. The model behind the questionnaire was the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Data were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling.ResultsThe degree of ease of use associated with the new technology (effort expectancy/usability) and the degree to which an individual believes that using a new technology will help them attain gains in job performance (performance expectancy) were the most important factors. Social influence and trust in the CDSS were other factors in the path model. r2 for the model was 0.63, indicating that almost two-thirds of the variance in the model was explained. The only significant effect in the multigroup analyses of path differences between two subgroups was for PROPOSE use and social influence (p = 0.01).ConclusionShared decision-making is essential to meet patient expectations in spine surgery. A trustworthy CDSS with ease of use and satisfactory predictive ability promoted by the leadership will stand the best chance of acceptance and bridging the communication gap between the surgeon and the patient. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a CDSS 
690 |a UTAUT 
690 |a PLS-SEM 
690 |a usability 
690 |a performance expectancy 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Electronic computers. Computer science 
690 |a QA75.5-76.95 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Digital Health, Vol 5 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1225540/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2673-253X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/16c7a2e487cd44b0ae595f751a2f31c0  |z Connect to this object online.