Physical and technical demands of offence, defence, and contested phases of play in Australian Football

Abstract Background This study compared the physical demands and effect of field location for different phases of play (offence, defence and contested), and examined the physical and technical demands of successful and unsuccessful phases of play during Australian Football matches. Methods Global po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Wing (Author), Nicolas H. Hart (Author), Fadi Ma'ayah (Author), Kazunori Nosaka (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_178b2513fe2a43419a209a98d1ecf80d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Christopher Wing  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nicolas H. Hart  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fadi Ma'ayah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kazunori Nosaka  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Physical and technical demands of offence, defence, and contested phases of play in Australian Football 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s13102-022-00425-1 
500 |a 2052-1847 
520 |a Abstract Background This study compared the physical demands and effect of field location for different phases of play (offence, defence and contested), and examined the physical and technical demands of successful and unsuccessful phases of play during Australian Football matches. Methods Global positioning system (GPS) and technical performance data were collected from 32 male Australian Football players in one club over 19 games in the 2019 season. The GPS data was aligned with phases of play acquired using Champion Data. Linear mixed models were used to detect differences between phases of play and field location which were further contextualized using Cohen's d effect size. Results Physical demands were greatest (p < 0.001) in defensive phases for backs (ES 0.61 to 1.42), and offensive phases for midfielders (ES 0.65 to 0.96) and forwards (ES 0.84 to 1.94). Additionally, distance and high-speed running were lowest in contested phases irrespective of playing position. Distance and high-speed running were greatest in larger field locations (e.g., full ground). No pattern was evident for accelerations or decelerations. Successful offensive plays demonstrated greater physical and technical outputs for midfielders and forwards, whereas the opposite was found for backs. Physical output was largely greater in unsuccessful defensive plays for all positions; however, the rate of tackles and marks was greater during successful defence. Conclusion These findings enable a greater understanding of the demands of Australian Football matches, and can be utilized to inform both representative training design, and the evaluation of player performance. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Match analysis 
690 |a Microsensor technology 
690 |a Physical performance 
690 |a Performance analysis 
690 |a Sports medicine 
690 |a RC1200-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00425-1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2052-1847 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/178b2513fe2a43419a209a98d1ecf80d  |z Connect to this object online.