Developing a Hospital Managerial Performance Assessment Tool in Iran

Background: Performance assessment tries to find the best, valid and cost-effective way of measuring performance and work satisfaction. There are several indicators for health systems performance evaluation which ignore the managerial aspect. We aimed at evaluating the validity and reliability of ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Jannati (Author), Elham Dadgar (Author), Jafar Sadegh Tabriz (Author), Masoumeh Gholizadeh (Author), Neda Kabiri (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_184a0ce16e2c4411a3ddd3dc9f70d06c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ali Jannati  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elham Dadgar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jafar Sadegh Tabriz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Masoumeh Gholizadeh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neda Kabiri  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Developing a Hospital Managerial Performance Assessment Tool in Iran 
260 |b Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2538-5070 
500 |a 2538-4716 
520 |a Background: Performance assessment tries to find the best, valid and cost-effective way of measuring performance and work satisfaction. There are several indicators for health systems performance evaluation which ignore the managerial aspect. We aimed at evaluating the validity and reliability of managerial performance assessment tool for Iranian hospitals. Methods: The current study is a part of larger study which aims at developing a reliable and valid tool for managerial performance assessment tool. The intended tool has seven dimensions of planning, organizing, leadership, information management, resource management, clinical governance, and performance indicators. We conducted a 2-round Delphi study with 18 experts whom were selected purposefully to evaluate the validity of the tool. Reliability was assessed through implementing the tool in three randomly chosen hospitals of Tabriz. Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) along with internal consistency and Cronbach's alpha were calculated for this reason. Results: A checklist with 117 indicators was prepared. After determining the validity and reliability of checklist, scores for these indicators were calculated given the importance scores. The whole tool has the score of 1000. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.76 for the whole checklist. Conclusion: The validated tool in the current research can be used in performance assessment, evidence-based dismissal, installation, and upgrading of hospital managers in order to avoid non proper selection of these managers. Further researches are needed to apply this tool in managerial performance assessment of hospitals in order to measure probable bugs of this model.   
546 |a EN 
690 |a Management 
690 |a  Performance Assessment 
690 |a  Checklist 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Evidence Based Health Policy, Management & Economics, Vol 1, Iss 4, Pp 198-204 (2017) 
787 0 |n http://jebhpme.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-26-27&slc_lang=en&sid=1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2538-5070 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2538-4716 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/184a0ce16e2c4411a3ddd3dc9f70d06c  |z Connect to this object online.