Evaluation of content usefulness and quality of YouTube™ videos as an information source for maxillofacial prosthesis

Background Social media platforms such as YouTube™ have become a widely popular source for information regarding health-related issues about medical and dental issues. The simplicity of online watching has concealed the drawback that these videos are not regularly reviewed or checked for their suita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rishu Koul (Author), E. Mahesh Gowda (Author), Guruprasada Upadhyay (Author), Deepak Kalia (Author), Kamal Verma (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1aa8d67ac4c54e4a9b0698df9c49b9b7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Rishu Koul  |e author 
700 1 0 |a E. Mahesh Gowda  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Guruprasada Upadhyay  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Deepak Kalia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kamal Verma  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of content usefulness and quality of YouTube™ videos as an information source for maxillofacial prosthesis 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2772-5243 
500 |a 2772-5251 
500 |a 10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_49_24 
520 |a Background Social media platforms such as YouTube™ have become a widely popular source for information regarding health-related issues about medical and dental issues. The simplicity of online watching has concealed the drawback that these videos are not regularly reviewed or checked for their suitability as educational resources for dental professionals and students. Aim The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the content and quality of videos on YouTube™ regarding maxillofacial prosthesis as a source of learning by dental professionals. Materials and Methods Fifty-one videos satisfying inclusion criteria were watched and carefully reviewed. After that, the following data were recorded in terms of domain in maxillofacial prosthesis: number of views, likes, comments, subscribers of the channel, viewing rate, duration since upload of video, video length/duration, primary purpose of videos, video sources, target group of video, video content, video content usefulness score, modified discern instrument score, and global quality score. Results No misleading video about said topic was uploaded during the period. Only 5.9% of the YouTube™ videos on maxillofacial prostheses were good. Conclusions There is a dearth of good-quality videos and videos about maxillofacial prosthesis maintenance, which raises questions if maxillofacial videos on YouTube™ would be equally beneficial for patients. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a global quality score 
690 |a maxillofacial prosthesis 
690 |a modified discern instrument score 
690 |a video content usefulness 
690 |a youtube™ 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences, Vol 15, Iss 3, Pp 149-156 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_49_24 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2772-5243 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2772-5251 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1aa8d67ac4c54e4a9b0698df9c49b9b7  |z Connect to this object online.