The Frequency of Emotions and Emotion Variability in Self-regulated Learning: What Matters to Task Performance?

Emotion variability and its relationship to performance is an underexplored area of research both inside and outside the realm of medical education. We address this gap by examining the relative importance of the frequency of emotions and emotion variability that occurred in specific phases of self-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shan Li (Author), Juan Zheng (Author), Susanne P. Lajoie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: EARLI, 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1b0ac76f1f2f40aabfbe409705f8f13b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shan Li  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Juan Zheng  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susanne P. Lajoie  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Frequency of Emotions and Emotion Variability in Self-regulated Learning: What Matters to Task Performance? 
260 |b EARLI,   |c 2021-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.14786/flr.v9i4.901 
500 |a 2295-3159 
520 |a Emotion variability and its relationship to performance is an underexplored area of research both inside and outside the realm of medical education. We address this gap by examining the relative importance of the frequency of emotions and emotion variability that occurred in specific phases of self-regulated learning (SRL) in predicting students' performance. Specifically, 23 medical students were recruited to complete the task of diagnosing a virtual patient in a hospital-simulated environment. Students' facial expressions were video-recorded and were classified into basic emotions. We calculated the frequency of emotions and emotion variability at each SRL phase: forethought, performance, and self-reflection. Findings revealed that both the frequency of emotions and emotion variability influenced clinical reasoning performance, but they functioned differently in different SRL phases. Moreover, emotion variability negatively predicted performance regardless of which SRL phases it was tied to. This study helps shift the focus of research from the effect of emotions on performance to the joint effect of emotion and emotion variability, which has the potential to address the inconsistency in emotion-related research findings. Although we situate the study in the context of clinical reasoning, findings from this research inform the research of emotion in learning and instruction for other domains. Furthermore, this study lays the foundation for future advances in emotion-related study designs since the introduction of emotion variability leaves many questions unanswered and shows promise for new research directions. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a emotion variability 
690 |a self-regulated learning 
690 |a srl phases 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontline Learning Research, Vol 9, Iss 4, Pp 76-91 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/901/995 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2295-3159 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1b0ac76f1f2f40aabfbe409705f8f13b  |z Connect to this object online.