Daily Versus Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation Regimen- A Randomized Parallel Open Label Trial among Reproductive Age Group Women in an Urban Poor Locality of Bengaluru

Introduction:The global prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women is 30.2% and in India it is 56.2%.At least half the burden of anaemia is associated with iron deficiency. Women of reproductive age are at higher risk of developing iron deficiency because of losses during menstruation. Though Daily...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vairavasolai P (Author), Jayanthi Srikanth (Author), Madhusudan M (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine, 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1b594daa70d2433d95e6cdebe7364a58
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Vairavasolai P  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jayanthi Srikanth  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Madhusudan M  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Daily Versus Weekly Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation Regimen- A Randomized Parallel Open Label Trial among Reproductive Age Group Women in an Urban Poor Locality of Bengaluru 
260 |b Indian Association of Preventive and Social Medicine,   |c 2020-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.51957/Healthline_153_2020 
500 |a 2320-1525 
500 |a 2229-337X 
520 |a Introduction:The global prevalence of anaemia in non-pregnant women is 30.2% and in India it is 56.2%.At least half the burden of anaemia is associated with iron deficiency. Women of reproductive age are at higher risk of developing iron deficiency because of losses during menstruation. Though Daily supplementation with iron and folic acid for a period of 3 months has been the standard as an approach for the prevention and treatment of iron deficiency anaemia among women of reproductive age, there has been limited success with the daily regimen in public health programmes, Intermittent use of oral iron supplements has been proposed as an effective alternative. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of weekly and daily oral iron and folic acid therapy in improving the Hemoglobin levels among the reproductive age group women, adverse effects and compliance to both the regimens. Method:This was a comparative Randomized parallel open label trial conducted in an urban poor locality of Bengaluru conducted between January 2014 and January 2016. All the women in the reproductive age group (15-45 years) with mild to moderate anemia were included in the study. Sample size of 106 subjects was randomly allocated into the 2 groups (53 into weekly regimen and 53 into daily regimen). The subjects were supplemented with IFA tablets for 3 months according to their regimen. Results:Mean increase in Haemoglobin (Hb) in the daily group (1.92±1.1 g/dl) was significantly (P=<0.01) more when compared to that in the weekly group (0.91±0.82 g/dl). Incidence of all the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) were more in the daily group compared to weekly group. However, the difference was only significant for abdominal pain and metallic taste (P=<0.01 and 0.02 respectively). The proportion of subjects reporting at least one ADR was also significantly more (P=<0.01) in the daily group compared to the weekly group. Compliance for weekly regimen (97.12%) was found to be significantly better(P=<0.01) when compared to that of the daily regimen (94.07%). Conclusions: Daily regimen was more effective in raising the hemoglobin levels when compared to weekly regimen. Incidence of abdominal pain and metallic taste were significantly more in the daily group compared to weekly group. Compliance for weekly regimen was significantly better when compared to that of the daily regimen. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a iron and folic acid supplementation 
690 |a reproductive age group women 
690 |a iron deficiency anemia 
690 |a hemoglobin 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Healthline, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 21-27 (2020) 
787 0 |n http://www.healthlinejournal.org/index_pdf/328.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2320-1525 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2229-337X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1b594daa70d2433d95e6cdebe7364a58  |z Connect to this object online.