Women's Attitudes towards the Option to Choose between Karyotyping and Rapid Targeted Testing during Pregnancy
Objectives. Pregnant women, referred because of an increased risk of fetal Down syndrome, who underwent an invasive prenatal procedure were offered a choice between karyotyping and rapid targeted testing. This study aims to assess women's attitudes and experiences towards what option to choose....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Angelique J. A. Kooper (Author), Dominique F. C. M. Smeets (Author), Ilse Feenstra (Author), Lia D. E. Wijnberger (Author), Robbert J. P. Rijnders (Author), Rik W. P. Quartero (Author), Peter F. Boekkooi (Author), John M. G. van Vugt (Author), Arie P. T. Smits (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited,
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Clinical utility of skin karyotype
by: Luiza E. Dorfman, et al.
Published: (2015) -
CHOICE: Choosing Health Options In Chronic Care Emergencies
by: Elspeth Guthrie, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Choosing anesthesia options for cataract surgery in patients with dementia
by: Chandra M Kumar, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Prenatal diagnosis of a trisomy 7 mosaic case: CMA, CNV-seq, karyotyping, interphase FISH, and MS-MLPA, which technique to choose?
by: Xiaoyi Cong, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study
by: Bhola Shama L, et al.
Published: (2008)