COGNITIVE AND ONTOLOGICAL ESSENCE OF AXIOLOGICAL DOMINANTS AND PRINCIPLES OF THEIR TAXONOMY IN DIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC REVIEW

The article provides a critical outline of elucidation of the cognitive and ontological essence of axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language and a definition of the principles of their taxonomy in diachronic and synchronic review. The author makes a hypothesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nataliia Stefanova (Author)
Format: Book
Published: National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", 2018-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1c16d538aaac44c7bf69bdb5a19b6d24
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nataliia Stefanova  |e author 
245 0 0 |a COGNITIVE AND ONTOLOGICAL ESSENCE OF AXIOLOGICAL DOMINANTS AND PRINCIPLES OF THEIR TAXONOMY IN DIACHRONIC AND SYNCHRONIC REVIEW 
260 |b National Technical University of Ukraine "Kyiv Polytechnic Institute",   |c 2018-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.20535/2410-8286.131680 
500 |a 2409-3351 
500 |a 2410-8286 
520 |a The article provides a critical outline of elucidation of the cognitive and ontological essence of axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language and a definition of the principles of their taxonomy in diachronic and synchronic review. The author makes a hypothesis that philosophical and axiological thoughts on this matter have not been homogeneous as in diachronic sense of its study (in particular, in the ancient world, the Middle Ages and Modern period etc.) so as in synchronic segment. It is proved that despite the ancient philosophers' efforts such major value concepts as "Truth", "Good", "Beauty", "Benefit" were left without clear understanding. Thus, they were not differentiated. The attempts of philosophical categorisation and conceptualisation remained to be undertaken by Renaissance scientists and thinkers. However, the notion "value" gets its philosophic status only in the Modern period, which was critical for the development of values taxonomy. The article argues that only after establishment of axiology as an independent philosophical doctrine it was possible to articulate four fundamental principles of the values structure: ontological, which makes it possible to explain scientifically the existential localisation of values and their correlation to human existence; gnoseological (or cognitive), with the help of which we experience values and necessity to study their correlation on the basis of both formalised principle, which is used for general rules of taxonomic hierarchy of values, and conceptual principle, which reveals the essence of values and determines their place in the defined hierarchy. The researcher introduces a new ethnosemiometric vector of axiological issues development directly within linguistics, which will enable to assess axiological dominants with the representatives of different cultures of language relying on the given values taxonomy and values hierarchy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a axiological dominants 
690 |a culture of language 
690 |a ontological principle 
690 |a cognitive principle 
690 |a formalised principle 
690 |a conceptual principle 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Novìtnâ Osvìta, Vol 5 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://ae.fl.kpi.ua/article/view/131680 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2409-3351 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2410-8286 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1c16d538aaac44c7bf69bdb5a19b6d24  |z Connect to this object online.