Comparison of the profiles of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC lacking driver gene mutations: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background: Numerous first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were developed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking driver gene mutations. However, this group consists of a heterogeneous patient population, for whom the optimal therapeutic choice is yet to be conf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fu Wenfan (Author), Xu Manman (Author), Shi Xingyuan (Author), Jiang Zeyong (Author), Zhao Jian (Author), Dai Lu (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1c336538b6ec49f09a2443c973f25670
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Fu Wenfan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xu Manman  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shi Xingyuan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jiang Zeyong  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zhao Jian  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dai Lu  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the profiles of first-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC lacking driver gene mutations: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2040-6231 
500 |a 10.1177/20406223231189224 
520 |a Background: Numerous first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) were developed for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lacking driver gene mutations. However, this group consists of a heterogeneous patient population, for whom the optimal therapeutic choice is yet to be confirmed. Objective: To identify the best first-line immunotherapy regimen for overall advanced NSCLC patients and different subgroups. Design: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: We searched several databases to retrieve relevant literature. We performed Bayesian NMA for the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (tr-AEs) with a grade equal or more than 3 (grade ⩾ 3 tr-AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels, histologic type, central nervous system (CNS) metastases and tobacco use history. Results: For the PD-L1 non-selective patients, sintilimab plus chemotherapy (sinti-chemo) provided the best OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.42-0.83]. Nivolumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-bev-chemo) was comparable to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo-bev-chemo) in prolonging PFS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.51-1.91). Atezo-bev-chemo remarkably elevated the ORR than chemotherapy (OR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.51-6.59). Subgroup analysis showed pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro-chemo) ranked first in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history, and ranked second in OS in subgroups of PD-L1 ⩾ 1% and PD-L1 1-49%. Cemiplimab and sugemalimab plus chemotherapy ranked first in OS and PFS for squamous subgroup, respectively. For patients with CNS metastases, nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-ipili-chemo) and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy provided the best OS and PFS, respectively. Conclusions: Sinti-chemo and nivo-bev-chemo were two effective first-line regimens ranked first in OS and PFS for overall patients, respectively. Pembro-chemo was favorable for patients in subgroups of PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 ⩾ 1%, PD-L1 1-49%, non-squamous, no CNS metastases, with or without smoking history. Addition of bevacizumab consistently provided with favorable PFS results in patients of all PD-L1 levels. Cemiplimab was the best option in squamous subgroup and nivo-ipili-chemo in CNS metastases subgroup due to their advantages in OS. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease, Vol 14 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223231189224 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2040-6231 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1c336538b6ec49f09a2443c973f25670  |z Connect to this object online.