A Comparative Study on Sensitivity and Specificity of Conventional and Unconventional IgG and IgM Assays for Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis

Background: Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease with widespread distribution throughout the world. It is caused by the pro­tozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. As laboratory diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is not straightforward, this study was aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of convention...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: MJ Gharavi (Author), H Oormazdi (Author), ES Roointan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2008-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_1c7f3bcc04be4d57ae6626b35a836963
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a MJ Gharavi   |e author 
700 1 0 |a H Oormazdi   |e author 
700 1 0 |a ES Roointan   |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Comparative Study on Sensitivity and Specificity of Conventional and Unconventional IgG and IgM Assays for Diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis 
260 |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2008-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2251-6085 
500 |a 2251-6093 
520 |a Background: Toxoplasmosis is a zoonotic disease with widespread distribution throughout the world. It is caused by the pro­tozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. As laboratory diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is not straightforward, this study was aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of conventional and unconventional methods of diagnosis based on the meas­urement of IgM and IgG for determination of the best method. Methods: One hundred suspected cases of toxoplasmosis referred to two laboratories in Tehran and Karaj were entered into this comparative analytical study. The serum specimens of these cases were tested with ELISA, IFA, chemiluminescence (CLIA) and ELFA for presence of IgG and IgM. Results: When compared with the ELFA IgG method, the CLIA IgG had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (100%). In comparison with ELFA IgM method, CLIA IgM and ELISA IgM had the same sen­sitivity (92%), but the sensitivity of ELISA IgM (100%) was higher than CLIA IgM (97.3%). The positive and negative pre­dictive values of ELISA IgM were 100% and 97.4%, respectively and those of CLIA IgM were 96% and 98%, in that or­der. Conclusion: Although, the reliability of the compared methods are close to each other, the automatic methods (CLIA, ELFA) are preferred because of high reproducibility, less personnel costs, shorter test time and etc. Therefore, we recom­mend application of these methods for diagnosing of toxoplasmosis and re-emphasize that these are the most suitable tests for measurement of toxoplasma IgM levels. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Toxoplasmosis 
690 |a Sensitivity 
690 |a Specificity 
690 |a IgG 
690 |a IgM 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Iranian Journal of Public Health, Vol 37, Iss 4 (2008) 
787 0 |n https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/2012 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2251-6085 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2251-6093 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/1c7f3bcc04be4d57ae6626b35a836963  |z Connect to this object online.